Skip to content

Reducing Heart Failure Risk in Late-Life With Physical Activity

Reducing Heart Failure Risk in Late-Life With Physical Activity: Impact on Cardiac Structure and Function and Proteomic Signatures

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06247774
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-02-08
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2029-05-01
Last updated
2026-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Rehabilitation, Exercise Training, Hypertension, Proteomics

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the molecular pathways associated with the benefit of a regular exercise program in patients with high blood pressure and who don't already participate in regular exercise. The main question it aims to answer is to identify protein signatures associated with the benefits of a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program. The trial will enroll 42 participants, who will be randomized to a 12 week cardiac rehabilitation exercise program versus control arm and asked to participate in the following at the beginning and end of study: * Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) * Echocardiogram * Physical function test * 6-minute walk test * Hand grip strength * Quality of life questionnaire * Blood draws Researchers will compare results between those who do and don't participate in the exercise program.

Detailed description

Lifestyle modification with physical activity (PA) appears to be protective of several age-related cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, including heart failure (HF), in a dose-dependent manner. While many studies with exercise training have demonstrated improvement in quality of life and cardiorespiratory fitness, findings have not been consistent with regards to the potential for exercise to preserve or even improve cardiac function in adults with HF. There remains incomplete understanding of the molecular pathways by which PA mitigates HF risk. Furthermore, exercise studies often exclude older adults, who are disproportionately affected by HF, though our preliminary data suggest the protective effects of PA extend to late-life. Older adults are at particularly heightened risk for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which is characterized by impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and impaired systolic deformation despite preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Unlike with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), effective pharmacologic therapies or interventions to improve cardiac function among individuals with preserved LVEF are limited. Thus, there is a critical need to define the cardiovascular mechanisms by which PA impacts HF risk in older adults that may enable the identification of novel therapeutic targets to prevent HF and HFpEF in particular. As proteins orchestrate and carry out cellular functions in health and in diseases, one method of characterizing changes in CV function is to investigate cell signaling by studying the circulating proteome. Proteomic approaches have previously been used to identify pathways relevant to myocardial infarction and have also been used to investigate molecular pathways characterizing PA and CV disease. A recent study demonstrated upregulation of inflammation-related proteins in HFpEF patients (n=228) compared to controls, and their association with worse indices of cardiac function. Specific proteomic patterns have also been associated with aerobic exercise, with 2 proteomic modules that were specifically preserved with aging in habitual exercisers. Data from Swedish cohorts has also shown an association of leisure-time PA with 28 CV-specific proteins involved in atherosclerotic processes. Serial multi-omic measures (including proteomics) have been used to demonstrate marked intra-individual changes in circulating proteins with acute exercise. More recently, high-throughput proteomic profiling has been successfully employed in younger adults to identify baseline protein levels associated with change in cardiorespiratory fitness following an exercise intervention. However, to-date, limited data exist regarding intervention-related changes in the proteome in older adults at risk for HF and the extent to which these changes correlate with changes in cardiorespiratory fitness. Supervised exercise-training with cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been well established as an effective method to improve maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. Improvement in VO2 max has also been demonstrated with exercise training in sedentary older adults over 65 years of age. The objective of this proposal is to identify protein signatures characterizing the known benefits of a structured CR program on VO2 max. Our working hypotheses is that proteomic approaches will identify novel biomarkers that uniquely characterize molecular pathways associated with exercise training and CR-related changes in proteins will correlate with changes in VO2 max. Successful completion of this aim will identify possible novel protein signatures underlying the protective biological pathways mediated by a structured CR program that may be used as preliminary data for future grant proposals. Aim: Identify molecular pathways underlying the beneficial effect of a structured PA intervention on functional capacity with the use of plasma proteomics in older sedentary adults at high risk of HF. (BWH-based cohort). Hypotheses: (1) Randomization to participation in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program will result in improvement in circulating levels of 4 plasma proteins associated with change in VO2max, a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, and with genetic evidence supporting a causal effect on HF and cardiac structure (ATF6, STC1, JAG1, PTK7). The investigators will randomize 42 sedentary adults at high risk of HF (stage B HF) to participation in a CR program and perform proteomic analysis, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and echocardiography at baseline and 12 weeks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCardiac Rehabilitation

Participation in a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program

BEHAVIORALAttention Control

Participants will receive regular phone calls in place of cardiac rehabilitation visits

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Hypertension (controlled on stable medication regimen) * Structural heart abnormality (LVH or LA enlargement) * LVEF \> 50% * Sedentary * BMI \<30

Exclusion criteria

* Diabetes * Unable to exercise * Supplemental oxygen use * Pulmonary hypertension * Sleep apnea * Regular exercise training * Devices that limit ability to achieve target heart rate * Moderate to severe valve disease * Recent (within 3 months) major CV event or planned procedures (within 6 months) * Terminal illness, life expectancy \<6 months * Inability or unwillingness to comply with study requirements * No access to smart phone/tablet

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation training on single protein changes12 weeksChange in protein levels assessed by blood draws and measured by Somascan assay. ANCOVA analysis adjusting for baseline protein levels with intention to treat group assignment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of change in proteins with change in LV diastolic function12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in LV diastolic function
Correlation of change in proteins with change in VO2 max12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in VO2 max
Correlation of change in proteins with change in LV global longitudinal strain12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in LV global longitudinal strain
Correlation of change in proteins with change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Correlation of change in proteins with change in 6-minute walk test12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in 6-minute walk test
Correlation of change in proteins with change in grip strength12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in grip strength
Correlation of change in proteins with change in EQ-5D (QOL)12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in EQ-5D (QOL)
Correlation of change in proteins with change in step counts12 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in step counts
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in VO2 max12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in VO2 max
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in LV global longitudinal strain12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in LV global longitudinal strain
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in LV diastolic function12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in LV diastolic function
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in VE/VCO212 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in VE/VCO2
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in SPPB12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in SPPB
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in 6-minute walk test12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in 6-minute walk test
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in grip strength12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in grip strength
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in EQ-5D (QOL)12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in EQ-5D (QOL)
Correlation of change in proteins with change in VE/VCO212 weeksCorrelation of single protein changes associated with change in VE/VCO2
Correlation of baseline proteins with change in step counts12 weeksCorrelation of baseline proteins with change in step counts

Contacts

CONTACTSheila Hegde, MD
shegde@bwh.harvard.edu6177325500
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSheila Hegde, MD

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026