Skip to content

Companion Robotic Pets and Older Adults

Effect of Companion Robotic Pets on Older Adult Well-Being

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06246734
Enrollment
53
Registered
2024-02-07
Start date
2024-03-03
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Burden, Dementia, Social Behavior

Brief summary

This research will assess the effect of companion robotic pets on the wellbeing of older adults and their family caregivers.

Detailed description

Social robot pets have been shown to have a positive impact on age-related physical, cognitive, emotional, and social challenges that affect independence and quality of life. These pets are designed to interact with people as a real pet might. They purr when stroked, make eye contact, have a heartbeat, turn toward a person when touched, are warm, and appear lifelike. Does introduction of such a pet reduce loneliness or promote engagement in older adults with cognitive or physical disability? This research will determine if: 1. Older adults with disabilities engage with such robotic companions; 2. Placing a robotic pet in a home enhances mood and positive affect in older people; 3. Caregivers to these adults find the robots beneficial for their own mood and time use. In a single-blind randomized controlled trial over 6-8 weeks, we hypothesize that older adults in the intervention arm will engage with the pets and show benefit in mood as reported by family caregivers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHasbro Joy for All robot pet companion

The robot pets are stuffed animals (dogs and cats) that have features that make them seem lifelike. For example, the animal toys turn their heads when petted, purr or make puppy sounds, feel warm, have a heartbeat, and go to sleep when they are ignored. They respond to attention and petting like a real pet. The robot pets do not collect information and do not require any maintenance, except a battery. Engagement with the device is at the discretion of participants.

Sponsors

Allegheny County Department of Human Services, Area Agency on Aging
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes assessor blind to treatment allocation

Intervention model description

Single-blind randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participating in Family Caregiver Support Program or OPTIONS Program administered by Allegheny County Area Agency on Aging 2. Provide unpaid family or friend caregiver support for at least 6 months 3. Older person aged 50+ 4. Able to provide verbal informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncomfortable with robot pet companion in home 2. Family Caregiver \< 18 years age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Positive Affect Scale from Baseline to 6-8 weeksBaseline and Follow-up, 6-8 weeks laterPROMIS Positive Affect Short Form 15a Scale: The PROMIS measures are normed for population probability samples, with raw scores transformed into T scores (mean 50, SD=10). The scale measures positive emotion (e.g., enjoyment, engagement, serenity).
Change in Negative Affect from Baseline to 6-8 weeksBaseline and Follow-up, 6-8 weeks laterPROMIS Emotional Distress and Anger Short Form Scale: The PROMIS measures are normed for population probability samples, with raw scores transformed into T scores (mean = 50, SD=10). The scale measures emotional distress (e.g., irritability, anger).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Engagement with PetFollow-up interview, 6-8 weeks after baselineAdapted companion animal questionnaire, treatment arm. The scale measures daily involvement with a pet, such as the frequency of holding the animal, sleeping in the same room, feeling responsible for the animal). Scale scores range from 6-30.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026