Malocclusion, Angle's Class
Conditions
Brief summary
This study includes patients who have had previous orthodontic treatments (without tooth extraction) and who have good alignment of their lower incisors. Investigators will compare two types of lingual retainers made with CAD-CAM
Detailed description
This study includes patients who have had previous orthodontic treatments (without tooth extraction) and who have good alignment of their lower incisors. Investigator will compare two types of lingual retainers made with CAD-CAM by comparing them with the traditional lingual retainers according to the following groups: 1. Patients will be apply to them a lingual retainer made of fibers manufactured using CAD-CAM technology 2. Patients will be apply to them a lingual retainer made of metal made using CAD-CAM technology 3. Patients will be apply to them a conventional lingual retainer made of braided stainless steel wire (control group)
Interventions
DEVICELingual retainer from Fiber
lingual retainer manufactured from fiber using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
DEVICELingual retainer from metal
lingual retainer manufactured from metal using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
DEVICETraditional retianer from braided
lingual retainer manufactured using traditional technique from stainless steel applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.
Sponsors
Hama University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with mixed dentition at age 14-24 years. They have a good alignment of the lower incisors.- Have good oral and periodontal health.-
Exclusion criteria
Patients who have a deep bite Patients who have previously used retainer Patients with poor oral care
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial plaque indicator | 6 months | the amount of plaque on the gingival edge on the tooth surface is determined by using a probe. This indicator does not need to color the plaque. This indicator is taken for all teeth monthly over a period of 6 months |
| Patient Acceptance Assessment: | 6 months | Patient acceptance will be evaluated according to a set of questions presented in a questionnaire sheet for each patient in the hospital Each period of the review where patient acceptance was recorded in three aspects: 1. Speech: The extent of the effect of the affixed fixative on the patient's comfort with speech will be recorded in each follow-up period in the event that there is no difficulty in speaking or there is difficulty in speaking. Is there a proven effect on speech? )Yes No( 2. Oral Care Procedures: The patient's ability to perform oral care procedures will be recorded In my case, the ease and difficulty of doing oral care procedures. How easy is it for you to perform oral care procedures? (easy / hard) |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed