Skip to content

Effects of Self-stretching and Aerobic Exercise in Gestational Diabetes.

Effects of Self-stretching With and Without Aerobic Exercise on Glycemic Control, Fatigue and Stress in Gestational Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06242106
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-02-05
Start date
2023-03-15
Completion date
2024-02-15
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes

Keywords

Aerobic exercise,, Fatigue, Stress, Gestational diabetes, Glycemic control, Self-stretching

Brief summary

: Gestational diabetes is a common pregnancy-related condition characterized by impaired glucose metabolism. It poses risks to both maternal and fetal health. Physical activity interventions, such as self-stretching and aerobic exercise, have shown potential in improving glycemic control and managing associated symptoms in individuals with diabetes. Objective: To determine the effects of self-stretching, with or without aerobic exercise, on glycemic control, fatigue, and stress for women with gestational diabetes

Detailed description

A Randomized controlled trial was conducted at khursheed majeed Hospital Lahore and was completed in 8th month after approval of synopsis .A sample of 24 women having age 20 to 40 with gestational diabetes were selected through non probability convenience sampling technique and then randomly allocated into group A(self-stretching with aerobic exercise) and group B (self-stretching without aerobic exercise). The outcome measures were glycemic control, assessed by measuring fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels using a glucometer fatigue and stress levels, measured by Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), respectively. These measures will be obtained at baseline and after the 7-weeks intervention period. All participants in both groups were evaluated before and after the treatment programs. Data was analyzed by using SPSS 25. Results: Mean value of Fasting blood glucose pre-treatment (Mean Difference=0.05) and post treatment (Mean Difference=0.14) with p value \<0.05. Mean value of 2 h postprandial blood glucose pre-treatment (Mean Difference=0.04) and post treatment (Mean Difference=0.20) with p value \<0.05.Mean value of Fatigue assessment scale pre-treatment (Mean Difference=1.56) and post treatment (Mean Difference=4.21) with p value \<0.05. Mean value of Perceived stress scale pre-treatment (Mean Difference=1.05) and post treatment (Mean Difference=4.74) with p value \<0.05 Conclusion: The study concluded that both groups Aerobic exercises + self-stretching (experimental group) and self-stretching Exercises only (control group) improve glycemic control, reduce fatigue and stress in gestational diabetes. However Aerobic exercises + self-stretching is more effective than self-stretching only

Interventions

A glucometer, which is a portable device used to measure blood glucose levels, was used in this study to collect data. It is a dependable and widely used tool for assessing glycemic control in people with diabetes, including gestational diabetes

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 20 -40. * Weight: 70kg-100kg. * Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes. * Second and third trimester of pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

* Females having history of depression * Thyroid problems * Preexisting diabetes • Early onset diabetes * Multiple pregnancies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glucometer8 weeksA glucometer, which is a portable device used to measure blood glucose levels, was used in this study to collect data. It is a dependable and widely used tool for assessing glycemic control in people with diabetes, including gestational diabetes. These measurements provided factual information on glycemic control and help compare blood glucose levels between the self-stretching with and without aerobic exercise groups
Fatigue assessment scale8 weeksThe Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is a 10-item self-report scale evaluating symptoms of chronic fatigue. The FAS treats fatigue as a unidimensional construct and does not separate its measurement into different factors. However, in order to ensure that the scale evaluates all aspects of fatigue, it measures both physical and mental symptoms. This scale can be useful in tracking fatigue over time in the context of psychiatric conditions, physical illness or chronic fatigue syndrome. The FAS has an internal consistency of .90. Results on the scale also correlated highly with the fatigue-related subscales of other measures like the Checklist Individual Strength. The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating more severe fatigue. A description of the fatigue experienced is presented for the total score where: less than 22 indicates normal (i.e. healthy) levels of fatigue, between 22 and 34 indicates mild-to-moderate fatigue and 35 or more indicates severe fatigue
Perceived stress scale:8 weeksThe Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. The tool, while originally developed in 1983, remains a popular choice for helping us understand how different situations affect our feelings and our perceived stress. The questions in this scale ask about your feelings and thoughts during the last month. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress. The Perceived Stress Scale is interesting and important because your perception of what is happening in your life is most important

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026