Skip to content

Prospective Observational Study of Diffuse Large-cell B Lymphoma

Supervised Machine Learning for the Prediction of Primary Refractory Status in Patients With Diffuse Large Cell B Lymphoma in a Monocentric Cohort at the Grand Hôpital de Charleroi

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06241729
Acronym
LBDGCréfract
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-02-05
Start date
2023-01-03
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, B-Cell

Brief summary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is currently a curable malignant disease for many patients with immuno-chemotherapy frontline treatment. However, around 30-40 % of patients, are unresponsive or will experience early relapse. The prognosis of primary refractory patient is poor and the management and treatment are a significant challenge due to the disease heterogeneity and the complex genetic framework. The reasons for refractoriness are various and include genetic abnormalities, alterations in tumor and tumor microenvironment. Patient related factors such as comorbidities can also influence treatment outcome. Recently the progress in Machine learning (ML) showed its usefulness in the procedures used to analyze large and complex datasets. In medicine, machine learning is used to create some predictive tools based on data-driven analytic approach and integration of various risk factors and parameters. Machine learning, as a subdomain of artificial intelligence (AI), has the capability to autonomously uncover patterns within datasets. It offers algorithms that can learn from examples to perform a task automatically.The investigators tested in a previous study five machine learning algorithms to establish a model for predicting the risk of primary refractory DLBCL using parameters obtained from a monocentric dataset. The investigators observed that NB Categorical classifier was the best alternative for building a model in order to predict primary refractory disease in DLBCL patients and the second was XGBoost.The investigators plan to extend this previous study by further exploring the two best-performing models (NBC Classifier and XGBoost), progressively incorporating a larger number of patients in a prospective way.

Detailed description

Primary refractory disease affects approximately 30-40% of patients diagnosed with DLBCL and is a challenge in the management of this disease due to its poor prognosis. The prediction of refractory status could be very useful in the treatment strategy allowing early intervention. Indeed, several options are now available depending on patient and disease characteristics such as salvage chemotherapy and autologous HSCT, targeted therapies or CAR T-cell therapy. Supervised machine learning techniques are able to predict outcomes in a medical context and therefore seem very suitable for this matter. An approach with machine learning seems particularly interesting because there are currently no statistical models efficient enough to provide decision-making support to clinicians. The investigators showed in a previous study that algorithms can be effective in predicting the refractory status of the disease from structured data from the patient's medical record. Due to the large number of available and effective salvage therapies, intervening quickly in the patient's therapeutic pathway seems to be the right option and the most personalized way to maximize the chances of cure while reducing those of toxicity. Based on clinical judgment of physicians and the best algorithms predictions, the physicians could choose an early treatment strategy for primary refractory DLBCL. The investigators found in a previous study two interesting models (NBC and XGBoost) for predicting refractory disease on the validation set. The application of machine learning techniques can significantly contribute to the management of DLBCL patients. These algorithms hold the potential to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding treatment strategies, allowing for the personalization of therapies based on each patient. This study aims to validate these findings on a broader scale in a prospective cohort and the value of this technology in the intricate management of primary refractory disease in DLBCL patients.

Interventions

OTHERAlgorithms to predict the probability of a primary refractory state

Follow-up of a cohort of patients with diffuse large-cell B lymphoma from 2024 using algorithms to predict the probability of a primary refractory state

Sponsors

Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with diffuse large-cell B lymphoma treated in the haematology department at the Grand Hôpital de Charleroi for the first time * able to understand the information and sign their consent form

Exclusion criteria

* under 18 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The area under the curve from receiver operator characteristic (ROC_AUC) in percent for each algorithm.3 yearsMetric for algorithms evaluation, this metric has the capability to encapsulate the effectiveness of a classifier in a single measurement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The idendification of risk factors for refractory disease in DLBCL patients.3 yearsstatistical analysis with cox model on variables
The Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival in the cohort by Kaplan Meier at the end of the study.3 yearskaplan Meier test and curves
The cohort survival rate at the end of the study.3 yearsSurvival rate for the cohort at the end of the study

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTMarie Detrait, MD, PhD
marie.detrait@ghdc.be0031 71 10
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDelphine Pranger, MD

Grand Hôpital de Charleroi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026