Skip to content

Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on DOAC

Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants - A Prospective Multicenter Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06241677
Acronym
DOAC-IVT
Enrollment
260
Registered
2024-02-05
Start date
2024-04-15
Completion date
2029-03-31
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)

Brief summary

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as safe and efficacious ischemic stroke prophylaxis for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). All four DOACs - apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban - were associated with lower risks of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Listed as core essential medicines by the World Health Organization, DOAC prescriptions have been surging worldwide. In Hong Kong, approximately 80,000 patients received DOACs from January 2009 through December 2022 according to the Hospital Authority registry. The widespread DOAC usage had created DOAC-specific clinical dilemmas that lack evidence-based treatment despite twenty years of prescribing experience. Ischemic stroke despite DOAC (IS-DOAC), in particular, may occur in up to 6% of DOAC users annually. Due to the in vivo anticoagulation effect, there had been concerns of intracerebral bleeding (ICH) with intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) for acute IS-DOAC. Under the current guideline recommendations, most acute IS-DOAC are contraindicated to IVT (see Intravenous thrombolytic therapy), which resulted in only a small proportion of acute ISDOAC patients being able to receive IVT even if presented early. Nonetheless, our group found that majority of patients had a DOAC level of \<50ng/mL only 24 hours after DOAC cessation (see work done by us), a level deemed clinically negligible and safe for thrombolytic therapy. Together with evolving clinical evidence discussed below, IS-DOAC patients maybe unnecessarily barred from IVT, thus compromised functional recovery. With robust pharmacokinetic and retrospective clinical evidence to support, it is hypothesized that IVT are safe in IS-DOAC patient. The investigators hereby propose a prospective multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of IVT in acute IS-DOAC.

Detailed description

In this prospective cohort study, the investigators aim to recruit consecutive DOAC users with IS-DOAC who meet the inclusion criteria. The investigators aim to determine the safety and efficacy of IVT among DOAC patients with acute ischemic stroke. It is hypothesized that compared to a matched cohort of patients with acute IS-DOAC excluded from IVT, IVT in IS-DOAC patients with a last-DOAC-ingestion of 12-48 hours improves neurological outcomes with an acceptable safety profile.

Interventions

Either alteplase (0.6 or 0.9mg/kg, maximum dosage 90mg) or tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg, maximum dosage 25mg) will be given

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Tuen Mun Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
United Christian Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Acute ischemic stroke patients with a last-known-well to presentation time within 4.5 hours 2. Patients who took any doses of apixaban (2.5mg or 5mg twice daily), dabigatran (110mg or 150mg twice daily), edoxaban (30mg or 60mg daily) or rivaroxaban (15mg or 20mg daily) 12-48 hours before presentation 3. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 3 4. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT (ASPECT) score ≥ 6 5. Pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3 6. Patients aged ≥ 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

1. Initial CT brain showing intracranial haemorrhage 2. Contraindications to IVT according to current guideline recommendations \[5\], except for the use of DOAC within 12-48 hours 3. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤ 30ml/min/1.73m2 4. Patients with bleeding propensities apart from the use of DOAC, e.g. platelet count of \< 100x109/L 5. Patients with significant head injury immediately prior to presentation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)up to 1 yearAs primary safety outcome. By the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification, the investigators shall categorize intracranial hemorrhages into HI1, HI2, PH1, PH2, and define symptomatic ICH as blood at any site in the brain with clinical deterioration (e.g. drowsiness and increased hemiparesis) or an increase in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥ 4 points (scores ranging from 0-42, higher scores indicating greater severity.)
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)3 months after CVATo measure the degree of disability as a primary efficacy outcome, on the scale of 0-6: 0= no symptoms at all, 6=dead

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of asymptomatic ICHup to 1 yearAs seen from computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Presence of hemorrhagic transformationup to 1 yearAs seen from computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Presence of malignant cerebral edemaup to 1 yearAs seen from computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTYiu Ming Bonaventure Ip, MB ChB
bonaventureip@cuhk.edu.hk+852-26352152
CONTACTTrista Hung
tristahung@cuhk.edu.hk+852-26352152
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBonaventure Yiu Ming Ip, MB ChB

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026