Inguinal Hernia
Conditions
Keywords
Self-gripping mesh, Laparoscopy, Herniorrhaphy
Brief summary
The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective. Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes. Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Interventions
PROCEDURELaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.
The TAPP group used self-gripping mesh for laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
PROCEDURELichtenstein hernia repair.
The Lichtenstein group used self-gripping mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.
Sponsors
Second Hospital of Jilin University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male patients aged 18 years and older. * Patients with a definite diagnosis of unilateral primary inguinal hernia. * Patients and their families were informed about the study protocol and agreed to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with femoral, recurrent, bilateral, incarcerated and strangulated hernias. * Patients with previous history of lower abdominal surgery. * Patients with contraindications to anaesthesia. * Patients with contraindications to laparoscopic surgery. * Failure to follow up patients as scheduled. * Patients with abdominal infections. * Those who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia surgery due to serious coagulation disorders, cardiopulmonary disorders, etc.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of moderate to severe pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery. | 3 and 6 months after surgery. | Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to score the postoperative pain at 3 and 6 months. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of recurrent inguinal hernia at 3 and 6 months after surgery. | 3 and 6 months after surgery. | Recurrence of inguinal hernia after surgery |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed