Skip to content

Investigating the Feasibility and Outcomes of Patient Self-Drain Removal After Ventral Hernia Repair

Empowering Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Investigating the Feasibility and Outcomes of Patient Self-Drain Removal After Ventral Hernia Repair

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06237855
Acronym
SDR
Enrollment
11
Registered
2024-02-02
Start date
2024-08-19
Completion date
2025-06-03
Last updated
2025-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Keywords

hernia repairs, drain removal, subcutaneous drains

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to teach patients to safely and effectively self-remove drains at home in adults (aged 18 and older) following a ventral hernia repair (VHR). Researchers will compare the group of subjects self-removing the drain at home to a control group of standard of care drain removal during a clinic visit by a provider to see if subjects are able to safely self-remove the drain at home.

Detailed description

Annually, in the United States, it is estimated that 500,000 ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) are performed with a cost in excess of $3.2 billion. Drains are frequently used in an effort to prevent seroma formation. Seromas are defined as a buildup of bodily fluid in a potential space post-surgery, usually at the surgical site. Rate of seroma has been estimated to be between 9-11% following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). The timing of the removal is usually after discharge but before patient's scheduled postoperative visit, thus most patients must call and speak to a health provider and come in for an additional clinic visit specifically for drain removal. The goal of this study is to teach patients to safely and effectively self-remove drains at home. This will allow patients to forgo the cost associated with commuting to the clinic, the clinic cost associated with nursing time and scheduling, the clinic visit, physician or nurse time to remove the drain and possibly lost wages for the patient from time off work. It is important to note that self-drain removal will not compromise or deviate from typical patient follow up. Instead, this will eliminate an extra patient visit when inevitably the timing of drain removal does not align with the typical follow-up period. Additionally, this will allow providers to see additional patient consultations or perform other duties, as they will not have the time constraints associated with in-office drain removal. This study will show that patient self-drain removal benefits the patients, the providers, and healthcare system without compromising patient safety, satisfaction, and postoperative care.

Interventions

OTHERSelf-drain removal

Subjects will be trained to self-remove drain at home following ventral hernia repair.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Comparison of control group (drain removal in clinic via provider) versus intervention group self-removing drain at home.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged ≥18 years. * Undergoing elective ventral hernia repair (VHR). * Sub-cutaneous drain placement. * Anticipated Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC) 1&2 wound class.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not have access to the online training video. * The surgeon does not believe the patient can self-remove the drain. * Planned concomitant procedures. * Current mesh infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of patients self-removing drains2 weeks post-operativelyPercentage of patients that are able to safely self-remove drain at home.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound complication rate30-days post-operatively.Comparison of the wound complication rate between the control and intervention groups. Wound complications will be defined as wound breakdown, wound cellulitis, hematoma, wound infection, and seroma requiring intervention. Each wound complication will be reported individually and as an aggregate wound complication overall rate.
Change in drain removal training survey scores from pre to post trainingHour 1Change in drain removal training survey scores from pre to post training. The same survey is given pre and post is training and is on a 5-point Likert scale survey with 1 representing strongly disagree and 5 representing strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more confidence in the self-drain removing process.
Post-drain removal satisfaction survey scores30-days post-operativelyScore on satisfaction survey following self-drain removal (intervention group only). Survey is on a 5-point Likert scale survey with 1 representing strongly disagree and 5 representing strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with at home self-drain removal.
Difference In Subject Costs30-days post-operativelyDifference in cost associated with reduction in clinic visits.
Difference in Subject Amount of Time30-days post-operativelyDifference in time associated with reduction in clinic visits and travel

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026