Skip to content

Three Weeks of Cast Immobilisation Versus One Week of Brace Immobilisation in Distal Radius Fractures

Non- or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Adult Patients <50 Years of Age Treated Non-operatively: Three Weeks of Cast Immobilisation Versus One Week of Brace Immobilisation a Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06235957
Acronym
DRPIPIII
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-02-01
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2024-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Radius Fractures, Fractures, Bone

Keywords

Distal radial fractures, non-operative treatment, immobilisation period

Brief summary

Three weeks of cast immobilisation versus one week of brace immobilisation in non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients \<50 years of age treated non-operatively.

Detailed description

Background: Currently, non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures are treated by three to five weeks of cast immobilisation. Many patients with a distal radius fracture suffer from long-term functional restrictions, which might be related to stiffness due to cast immobilisation. Current literature indicates that one week of immobilisation might be safe, however, no level one evidence is available. This trial aims to compare one week of brace immobilisation with three weeks of cast immobilisation in patients with distal radius fractures that do not need reduction. Methods: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of one week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18-50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with one week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with three weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation-score at six months. Secondary outcomes are: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-score at six weeks and six months, PRWE at six weeks, range of motion, pain, radiological outcome, complications and cost effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire. Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level one evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients.

Interventions

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group A are treated by cast immobilization for 3 weeks

OTHERBrace 1 week

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group B are treated in a brace for 1 week

Sponsors

Maasstad Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Amsterdam UMC
CollaboratorOTHER
Spaarne Gasthuis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A blinded evaluation of the trial patients functional status, radiographs and range of motion will be performed by a research assistant by use of the PRWE and qDASH scores

Intervention model description

This study will be conducted as a single-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial in three hospitals. In this study, three weeks of cast immobilisation is compared to one week of brace immobilisation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-50 years (to eliminate osteoporosis); 2. Primary non- or minimally displaced DRF; 3. Independent for activities of daily living.

Exclusion criteria

1. Fracture of the contralateral wrist; 2. Ipsilateral fractures, proximal of the DRF; 3. Pre-existent abnormalities or functional deficits of the fractured wrist; 4. Open fractures; 5. Polytrauma patients 6. Language disability to understand the Dutch patient information and questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Related Wrist Evaluation6 monthsThe primary outcome measure is the PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation) score after six months. Patients rate their outcome on a 0-10 scale on pain and functional outcome, and scores will be transformed to a 0-100 score. A higher score indicates greater disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand6 weeks, 6 monthsshortened version of the DASH Outcome Measure, using 11 items instead of 30 (scored 1-5) to measure pain and functional outcome. At least 10 of the 11 items must be completed to calculate a score. The scores will be transformed to a 0-100. A higher score indicates greater disability.
Range of motion6 weeks, 6 monthsRange of motion measured by goniometer
Pain/Visual analogue scale scoreat emergency department (day 0-1), one week, 6 weeks, 6 monthsPain measured by VAS score VAS-score is a widely used method for pain assessments. Patients score their pain on a scale of 1-10. A higher score indicated a higher level of pain.
Patient Related Wrist Evaluation6 weeksThe primary outcome measure is the PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation) score after six weeks The primary outcome measure is the PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation) score after six months. Patients rate their outcome on a 0-10 scale on pain and functional outcome, and scores will be transformed to a 0-100 score. A higher score indicates greater disability.
Complications6 weeks, 6 monthsComplications secondary displacement (radial shortening \>3mm, dorsal tilt \>10° or intra-articular step-off \>2mm), delayed/non-union, re-interventions, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), tendon injuries (ruptures and tendinitis), nerve injuries (carpal tunnel syndrome and lesions), and distal radial ulnar joint disability.
Cost-effectiveness6 weeks, 6 monthsCost-effectiveness measured by iMCQ (Medical Consumption questionnaires) Only the applicable items are included in this study. To create baseline data patients will be asked to complete those questionnaires at the ED at the day of trauma (t = 0). Patients will also be asked to complete these questionnaires at 6 weeks and 6 months
Radiological outcome6 weeks, 6 monthsAnalysis of X-rays, dorsal and volar tilt in degrees, radial height in millimetres and ulnar variance in millimetres will be calculated

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactEva van Delft, MD
e.vandelft@amsterdamumc.nl020 - 566 3111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026