Skip to content

Effect of Maitland Mobilization With Low Level Laser Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Effect of Maitland Mobilization With Low Level Laser Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06233955
Enrollment
75
Registered
2024-01-31
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
2023-03-01
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Background: Osteoarthritis is a common cause of chronic pain and disability in elderly people. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in combination with Maitland mobilization and conventional physical therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis. Design: Pre-test post-test randomized control trial.

Detailed description

Knee OA is associated with pain and disability, high treatment costs, decreased productivity, and absence from work and thus has a substantial and growing burden on society Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in combination with Maitland mobilization and conventional physical therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis. Participants: Seventy five subjects of both genders with age range from 50 to 65 years, with proven bilateral knee OA diagnosed and referred by orthopaedist were recruited for the study and randomly assigned into three groups.

Interventions

DEVICELow Level laser therapy

is a non-invasive light source treatment that generates a single wavelength of light. It emits no heat, sound, or vibration. It is also called photobiology or bio-stimulation

is a process of examination; assessment and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders by manipulative physiotherapy where a chain of oscillatory joint mobilization grades based on the pathological limit of tissue are used

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects with proven bilateral Knee OA with age range 50- 65 years according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. 2- Only patients with X-ray stages II and III osteoarthritis selected according to Kellgren & Lawrence classification system. 3- BMI equal to or less than 30 . 4- Patients with Knee pain lasted at least 6 months with intensity at least 3 on VAS scale in activities such as going up-and downstairs, sitting and squatting. 5- Patients with normal mental state. 6- Patients who are not participating in physical therapy in the recent 3 months. .

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient with history of gout, infection, tumour, autoimmune diseases, trauma or other causes of knee pain or knee deformities. 2. Patient with neurologic dysfunction, or with history of chronic disease that may affect the study. 3. Patient with history of knee intra-articular injection in the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scaleFour weeksIs a bidirectional 10 cm straight line with two labels, that is, no pain and worst possible pain, located at either end of the line. Patients were instructed to draw a vertical mark on the line indicating their pain level where zero mean no pain and 10 means worst imaginable pain
Pressure AlgometerFour weeksis a handheld pressure algometer that responds linearly to force application between 0 and 5 Kg and it has a 1-cm2 round rubber tip.
Knee digital goniometryFour weeksBaseline digital absolute + axis TM goniometer was used which consisted of one movable arm and one fixed arm and fulcrum

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score short formFour weeksconsists of a seven items measure of physical function descended from the items of the function, daily living and function, sports and recreational activity subscales of the KOOS Item responses are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. The questionnaire is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then using the nomogram so the raw score is converted to a true interval score (0-100) where zero means no difficulty and 100 means extreme difficulty

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026