Skip to content

Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in Uganda

Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in Children ≤ 5 Years of Age in Uganda: Study Protocol for a Cluster-randomized Double-blinded Control Trial: The Mossie-GO Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06232954
Acronym
Mossie-GO
Enrollment
5600
Registered
2024-01-31
Start date
2024-06-05
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaria, Mosquito-Borne Disease

Keywords

malaria, spatial repellent, vector control, transfluthrin, randomised control trial

Brief summary

A cluster-randomized double-blinded control trial will be conducted in Uganda to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy (PE) of Mossie-GO, an active spatial repellent system disseminating transfluthrin, in reducing the prevalence of malaria in children ≤ 5 years of age, as determined by RDT positivity and confirmed by microscopy. The study's secondary objective is to measure the diversionary impact of the intervention on locally unprotected individuals and impact of the intervention on entomological correlates of transmission including vector densities, host seeking behaviour and insecticide resistance. This will be conducted using Centre of Disease Control (CDC) light traps in households, human landing catches and World Health Organisation (WHO) tube tests. Further data collection include household behavioural surveys, air sampling to quantify concentration of transfluthrin present in air, acceptability surveys and intervention safety monitoring. Recruited households will be monitored across baseline data collection and followed up for 2 disease transmission seasons, for up to 18 months. The devices will be distributed to all consented eligible households in the two study arms: intervention and control. Intervention arm devices will be provided with transfluthrin treated discs and refill transfluthrin discs at frequent enough intervals to provide sustained protection. Households in the control arm will receive blank discs with no active ingredient. Households will be asked to continue using other malaria prevention practices, such as the use of bed nets, as recommended by national policy.

Detailed description

The impact of Mossie-GO on malaria cases will be determined through a blinded cluster randomized trial in malaria endemic settings. The device will be distributed to all consented eligible households in the two study arms: intervention and control. Intervention arm devices will be provided with transfluthrin treated discs and refill transfluthrin discs at frequent enough intervals to provide sustained protection. Households in the control arm will receive blank discs with no active ingredient and refill blank discs to maintain study blinding. The Mossie-GO repellent device is approximately 8 cm3 and can be fitted with repellent discs impregnated with transfluthrin and a carrier oil. These discs sit above a fan that is powered by a small motor charged by solar energy. The device is expected to both prevent bites and cause some mortality to mosquitoes when switched on for 8-12 hours overnight for up to 1 calendar month. The discs then need to be replaced. One Mossie-GO device will be provided per household, along with a solar cell unit that will be connected to the Mossie-GO unit and must be placed in direct sunlight to charge the Mossie-Go unit during the day, for use in the evening. Households will be asked to continue using other malaria prevention practices, such as bed nets, as recommended by national policy. At baseline, Mossie-GO will be distributed at the household level and should be placed in the room of the participant enrolled into the study (child ≤ 5 years of age) while they are sleeping. At the same time a baseline survey will be conducted and children ≤ 5 years of age will be tested for malaria using RDTs and microscopy, to determine baseline malaria prevalence. At this time, household surveys will also be conducted to classify housing structure and collect other variables which may impact the efficacy of the intervention. Following this period, sample size estimates may be adjusted based on malaria prevalence. All recruited households will be monitored at 6-monthly intervals and malaria testing will be done among children ≤ 5 years of age with RDTs and microscopy over a period of up to 18 months. Indoor light traps will be installed in selected households for approximately 3-4 nights in the 6 month intervals and run from 6pm to 7 am to collect mosquitoes indoors, and human landing catches will be conducted. Air sampling will also be conducted alongside mosquito collections to quantify the concentrations of transfluthrin in the air and to help inform entomological and epidemiological outcomes. An acceptability survey will also be conducted at the final data collection time point The unit of randomization is a cluster, which is defined as a discrete village or area containing a minimum of 100 households. Clusters will be divided into core and buffer zones. Twenty eight clusters will be identified per study arm (treatment and control), thus fifty six clusters will be selected in total. Households within the core zone of clusters will receive the Mossie-GO device (intervention or control). Households within the buffer zones will not receive the Mossie-GO. While all households within the core zone of the cluster are receiving the device, they will not all be sampled for the evaluation of the primary objective (PE). Only a total of 100 eligible, consenting households will be sampled within the core zones. Household surveys will also be conducted in these 100 households. For the evaluation of the secondary outcomes, a subset of houses will be selected. Diversionary impact: 100 households in buffer zone; entomological sampling: 10% of households in core zone; air sampling 1 household every 500m in core zone. The primary outcome (PE) will be compared between arms using logistic regression with a random effect for study cluster and adverse event data will be collected and summarised.

Interventions

DEVICEMossie-Go containing treated transfluthrin disc

The Mossie-GO repellent device is approximately 8 cm3 and can be fitted with repellent discs impregnated with transfluthrin and a carrier oil. These discs sit above a fan that is powered by a small motor charged by solar energy. The device is expected to both prevent bites and cause some mortality to mosquitoes when switched on for 8-12 hours overnight for up to 1 calendar month. The discs then need to be replaced.

DEVICEMossie-Go containing untreated blank disc

The Mossie-GO repellent device is approximately 8 cm3 and can be fitted with a blank untreated disc. These discs sit above a fan that is powered by a small motor charged by solar energy. The device containing the untreated disc is not expected to prevent mosquito bites. The discs will still be replaced monthly for blinding purposes.

Sponsors

Malaria Consortium
CollaboratorOTHER
ARCTECH INNOVATION LIMITED
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Africa Power Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

In exception of the data management personnel responsible for coordinating the manufacture and distribution of the Mossie-GO and independent statistician preparing the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) report, all study staff will remain blinded to the household treatment allocation, until the completion of data collection and the locking of the database at the end of the study. Unblinded study staff will have no role in study implementation or outcome assessment.

Intervention model description

Cluster-randomised placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Cluster level: Number of households \> 100 Household level: Presence of a child ≤ 5 years of age at point of enrolment in the study Adult head of household agrees to receiving and using the device as per manual instructions Adult head of household agrees to data collection visits and household surveys Children within household sleeps in cluster \> 90% of nights during any given month Individual level: ≤ 5 years of age when enrolled into the study No plans for extended travel (\> 1 month) outside of home during study Not participating in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or a medical procedure during the trial Provision of informed consent form (ICF) by the parent(s) or guardian Participants not on regular malaria prophylaxis

Exclusion criteria

Cluster level: Number of households \< 100 Household level: Presence of a child \> 5 years of age at point of enrolment in the study Adult head of household does not agree to data collection visits and household surveys Children within household sleeps in cluster \< 90% of nights during any given month Households where study personnel identify a security risk (i.e., site where drugs are sold, residents are always drunk or hostile). Individual level: \>5 years of age when enrolled into the study Plans for extended travel (\> 1 month) outside of home during study Participating or planned participation in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or a medical procedure during the trial No provision of ICF signed by the parent(s) or guardian Participants on regular malaria prophylaxis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Malaria prevalence18 monthsMalaria prevalence among children ≤ 5 years of age as determined by Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) positivity and confirmed by microscopy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Entomological correlates of transmission18 monthsMosquito species composition and population density in mosquitoes caught using indoor CDC-light traps and Anopheline-human contact (indoor and outdoor) using human biting rate (HBR) as an indicator for all anophelines. Measured by human-landing catch (HLC).
Household surveys18 monthsHousehold surveys to collect information on subject behaviour related to exposure to malaria and use of existing control tools
Assessment of the diversionary effect of spatial repellent in the buffer zone using RDT and microscopy18 monthsClusters are defined as discrete villages with a core and buffer zone. Buffer zones will be approximately 2km from the outer perimeter of the core zone and will not receive the intervention. This buffer zone will mitigate against the diversionary impact in the instance where villages are split into multiple clusters. The diversionary impact of the intervention on mosquitoes to locally unprotected individuals will be evaluated by measuring the malaria prevalence among children ≤ 5 years of age as determined by Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) positivity and confirmed by microscopy in a subset of households in the buffer zones. Mosquito population density and human biting rate will also be measured in the buffer zones.
Safety of intervention18 monthsSafety of intervention through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Acceptability survey18 monthsAcceptability of Mossie-GO in these communities
Air sampling18 monthsQuantification of the temporal changes in concentration of transfluthrin present in the air over the duration of its use and the impact of indoor temperature on the concentration

Countries

Uganda

Contacts

Primary ContactRobert Jones, PhD
robert.jones@arctechinnovation.com+447745845880
Backup ContactJane Achan, PhD
j.achan@malariaconsortium.org

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026