Skip to content

Performance Comparison of Two Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Lens Types

Performance Comparison of Two Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Lens Types

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06232590
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-01-31
Start date
2024-02-23
Completion date
2024-07-09
Last updated
2025-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

To evaluate and compare the performance of two monthly replacement multifocal contact lenses in existing wearers.

Detailed description

This was a prospective, randomized, participant-masked, crossover, bilateral dispensing study. Each lens type was worn for approximately 4-6 weeks: the lens prescription of each lens type was optimized after 3-10 days wearing experience, prior to starting a 1-month (28-32 days) wear period.

Interventions

DEVICEControl Lens (comfilcon A)

Multifocal monthly replacement contact lens for 1 month

DEVICETest Lens (lehfilcon A)

Multifocal monthly replacement contact lens for 1 month

Sponsors

Centre for Ocular Research & Education, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
42 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Were at least 42 years of age and had full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Had read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Self-reported having had a full eye examination in the previous two years; 4. Anticipated being able to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week; 5. Were willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 6. Habitually wore spherical multifocal soft contact lenses, for the past 3 months minimum: * Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of daily disposable lenses, * Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of Biofinity Multifocal, * Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of either TOTAL30 Multifocal or AirOptix plus HydraGlyde Multifocal 7. Had refractive astigmatism no higher than -0.75DC; 8. Is presbyopic and requires a reading addition of at least +0.75D and no more than +2.50D; 9. Could be fit and achieve binocular distance vision of at least 20/30 Snellen which participants also deem to be 'acceptable', with the available study lens parameters (Distance sphere +4 to -6; near addition as per study design).

Exclusion criteria

1. Were participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; 2. Had any known active ocular disease and/or infection that contraindicated contact lens wear; 3. Had a systemic or ocular condition that in the opinion of the investigator may have affected a study outcome variable; 4. Were using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may have affect contact lens wear or a study outcome variable; 5. Had known sensitivity to the diagnostic sodium fluorescein used in the study; 6. Self-reported as pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment; 7. Had undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Handling for Insertion1 monthSubjective rating collected in office using a 0-100 scale, where 0=Very difficult and 100=Very easy. The participant rated the study lens considering a typical day in the last 1 month of wear.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Participants who completed all study visits.
59
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 2: Second InterventionUnable to attend study visit10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 604 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Lens Handling for Insertion

Subjective rating collected in office using a 0-100 scale, where 0=Very difficult and 100=Very easy. The participant rated the study lens considering a typical day in the last 1 month of wear.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control LensLens Handling for Insertion95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Test LensLens Handling for Insertion96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026