Skip to content

Retrospective Study on the Direction of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Cranial Trauma CT Imaging

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence's Ability to Analyze and Recognize Cranial Trauma CT Imaging

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06230419
Enrollment
208
Registered
2024-01-30
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Hemorrhage

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Computed Tomography

Brief summary

The goal of this observational retrospective study is to evaluate artificial intelligences (AI)'s proficiency in identifying and annotating brain bleeds in computed tomography (CT) images. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Whether AIs at present are capable of analyzing and recognizing cerebral traumas in CT images? * If they are, how competent are they and how can humans take advantages of that? CT images were selected during the normal diagnosis and treatment process of patients, and no one needed to undergo any additional procedures connected to the study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

RenJi Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 92 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* People who had cerebral traumas with brain bleedings shown in CT images.

Exclusion criteria

* Brain bleedings were not clear or representative in CT images.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The identification completeness of the annotated images.1 monthsUse Photoshop to calculate the area of hemorrhage and the marked area, and then computing the ratio, import into Graphpad Prism for further analysis of the mean percentage and the standard deviation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The evaluations from professionals for outcomes produced by AIs1 monthsThe outputs will be evaluated by professional radiologists on a 4-point scale questionnaire from the completeness, accuracy and success of the annotation. Then the results of the questionnaire will be further analyzed in the Graphpad Prism to get the average score and the standard deviation.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026