Skip to content

Managing of Missed Meal Bolus by HCL Systems

How do the Currently Available HCL Systems Manage Missed Meal Bolus? The Comparison of Glycemic Outcomes After Missed Meal Bolus Between MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ and Ypsomed CamAPS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06230276
Acronym
NOELLE
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-01-30
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Brief summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare glycemic outcomes after missed meal bolus in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CwD) treated by one of the three most common used types of hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems - Medtronic MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ, Ypsomed CamAPS. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do the glycemic outcomes (area under the curve of glucose concentration change, maximal glucose rise from baseline, time to maximal glucose rise from baseline, CGM parameters) vary after missed meal bolus among different types of HCL systems? * Does the type of insulin analog influence glycemic outcomes after a missed meal bolus? Participants will have a precisely defined amount of enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast during eight different days under predetermined conditions. They will administer premeal bolus only for half of these meals.

Interventions

OTHERenteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast

Participants who are already treated by one of the HCL systems (MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ, Ypsomed CamAPS) will have a precisely defined amount of enteral nutrition (Resource Fibre, 2 kcal/ml) for breakfast during eight different days under predetermined conditions. They will administer premeal bolus only for half of these meals.

Sponsors

Zdeněk Šumník
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children with type 1 diabetes (CwD) 9.00-18.99 years old * use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) \>70% of the time 14 days before a regular check-up in the outpatient clinic * HCL use (MiniMed 780G, Tandem Control-IQ or Ypsomed CamAPS) \>3 months * duration of T1D \>2 years * baseline HbA1c level \<58 mmol/mol (7.5%) * weight \> 30 kilograms * without any medication influencing glycemia (f.e. gliflozins, systemic corticosteroids…) * signed informed consent form with the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in an area under the curve of a glucose concentration change 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.4 hour after a meal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in time to maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.4 hours after a meal
Difference in CGM parameters 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.4 hours after a mealtime in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (\> 13.9 mmol/L; \>250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (\< 3.0 mmol/L; \<54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)
Difference in an area under the curve of a glucose concentration change 4 hours after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using different types of insulin analogs4 hours after a mealinsulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro
Difference in a maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems.4 hours after a meal
Difference in time to maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using two different types of insulin analogs4 hours after a mealinsulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro
Difference in CGM parameters after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using insulin ultra-rapid lispro4 hours after a mealtime in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (\> 13.9 mmol/L; \>250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (\< 3.0 mmol/L; \<54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)
Difference in CGM parameters after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using insulin aspart.4 hours after a mealtime in range TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; 70-180 mg/dL) time above range level 1 TAR1 (10.1-13.9 mmol/L; 181-250 mg/dL) time above range level 2 TAR2 (\> 13.9 mmol/L; \>250 mg/dL) time below range level 1 TBR1 (3.0-3.8 mmol/L; 54-69 mg/dL) time below range level 2 TBR2 (\< 3.0 mmol/L; \<54 mg/dL) time in tight range TITR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L; 70-140 mg/dL)
Difference in a maximal glucose rise from baseline after a meal (30 g and 50 g of carbohydrates) with a missed premeal bolus between individual HCL systems using two different types of insulin analogs4 hours after a mealinsulin analogs - aspart and ultra-rapid lispro

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

Primary ContactAlžbeta Šantová, MD
alzbetkasantova@gmail.com+420 773 707 270

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026