Skip to content

A Trial to Learn How Effective and Safe Odronextamab is Compared to Standard of Care for Adult Participants With Previously Treated Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab (REGN1979), an Anti-CD20 x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (OLYMPIA-4)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06230224
Acronym
OLYMPIA-4
Enrollment
216
Registered
2024-01-30
Start date
2024-02-15
Completion date
2029-05-29
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL)

Keywords

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), Aggressive NHL, B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL), Odronextamab, Anti-CD20 × anti-CD3 bispecific antibody, Relapsed/Refractory NHL

Brief summary

This study is researching an experimental drug called odronextamab, referred to as study drug. The study is focused on patients with previously treated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose cancer has stopped responding to treatment (also known as 'refractory') or has returned (also known as 'relapsed'). The aim of the study is to see how safe, tolerable and effective the study drug is when given alone. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug versus Standard of Care (SOC) * How much study drug is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the study drug less effective or could lead to side effects) * Comparing the impact from the study drug versus SOC on quality-of-life and ability to complete routine daily activities

Interventions

DRUGOdronextamab

Administered by intravenous (IV) infusion

DRUGIfosfamide

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the ICE ± R salvage therapy

DRUGCarboplatin

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the ICE ± R salvage therapy

DRUGEtoposide

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the ICE ± R salvage therapy

DRUGRituximab

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the ICE ± R, or DHAP ± R, or GDP ± R salvage therapy.

DRUGDexamethasone

Administered by IV, or orally (PO) as part of the DHAP ± R, or GDP ± R salvage therapy.

DRUGCisplatin

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the DHAP ± R or GDP +/-R salvage therapy.

DRUGCytarabine

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the DHAP ± R salvage therapy.

DRUGGemcitabine

Administered by IV infusion, as part of the GDP ± R salvage therapy.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Histologically proven aggressive B-NHL, as described in the protocol. Availability of tumor tissue for submission to central laboratory is required for study enrollment. Archival tumor tissue for histological assessment prior to enrollment is allowed 2. Have primary refractory or relapse 12 months or less (≤) from initiation of frontline therapy Only patients who received 1 prior line of therapy containing an anti-Cluster of Differentiation 20 (CD20) antibody and anthracycline are allowed for enrollment 3. Have measurable disease with at least one nodal lesion with longer diameter (LDi) greater than 1.5 cm or at least one extranodal lesion with LDi greater than 1.0 cm, documented by diagnostic imaging (computed tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) 4. Intent to proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), as described in the protocol 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 6. Adequate hematologic and organ function. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma or known involvement by non-primary CNS NHL, as described in the protocol 2. History of or current relevant CNS pathology, as described in the protocol 3. A malignancy other than NHL unless the participant is adequately and definitively treated and is cancer free for at least 3 years, with the exception of localized prostate cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ, breast cancer in situ, or nonmelanoma skin cancer that was definitively treated 4. Any other significant active disease or medical condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or put the participant at significant risk, as described in the protocol 5. Wash-out period from prior anti-lymphoma treatments and infections, as described in the protocol 6. Allergy/hypersensitivity to study drug, or excipients. NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion /

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Event-free survival (EFS) as assessed by independent central review (ICR)Assessed up to 3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival (PFS) as assessed by ICRAssessed up to 3 years
Best overall response (BOR) as assessed by ICRAssessed up to 6 months
Overall survival (OS)Assessed up to 3 years
Overall change in physical functioning as measured by scores of the physical function scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)Assessed up to 3 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a global health status (GHS)/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
EFS as assessed by local investigatorAssessed up to 3 years
PFS as assessed by local investigatorAssessed up to 3 years
BOR as assessed by local investigatorAssessed up to 6 months
Complete response (CR) as assessed by ICRAssessed up to 6 months
CR as assessed by local investigatorAssessed up to 6 months
Duration of response (DOR) assessed by ICRAssessed up to 3 years
DOR assessed by local investigatorAssessed up to 3 years
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)Assessed up to 1 year
Severity of TEAEsAssessed up to 1 year
Odronextamab concentrations in serumAssessed up to 6 months
Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to odronextamab over the study durationAssessed up to 6 months
Titers of ADAs to odronextamab over the study durationAssessed up to 6 months
Incidence of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to odronextamab over the study durationAssessed up to 6 months
Measurable residual disease (MRD) statusAssessed up to 6 months
Overall change in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as measured by scores of the EORTCQLQ- C30Assessed up to 3 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status / QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
Overall change in PROs, as measured by scores of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-LymS)Assessed up to 3 yearsThe FACT-Lym lymphoma subscale (LymS) includes 15 items to assess NHL-related symptoms and concerns. All questions are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). Higher scores are associated with a worse quality of life.
Overall change in PROs, as measured by scores of the EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L)Assessed up to 3 yearsThe EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: "no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems". The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled "Best imaginable health state" and "Worst imaginable health state".
Overall change in score of the Global Population item 5 (GP5) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaireAssessed up to 3 yearsA single item GP5 of the validated FACT-G questionnaire will be used to assess from the participant perspective the overall impact of treatment side-effect. The question item is on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Hungary, Malaysia, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trial Management

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 12, 2026