Skip to content

Amoxicillin Alone Versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for Community-acquired Pneumonia in Patients Aged 65 Years or Older, and Hospitalized in a Non-intensive Care Unit Ward

Amoxicillin Alone Versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for Community-acquired Pneumonia in Patients Aged 65 Years or Older, and Hospitalized in a Non-intensive Care Unit Ward: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06229288
Acronym
CAPTAIN
Enrollment
326
Registered
2024-01-29
Start date
2024-04-25
Completion date
2027-05-25
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community-acquired Pneumonia

Keywords

Community-acquired pneumonia, Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate

Brief summary

Reduce inappropriate antibiotic use is a priority of public health agencies. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most important indications for antibiotic prescriptions. In the majority of the studies of CAP, there is a large proportion of cases with no pathogen identified. Thus, the choice of the empirical antibiotic depends on the most likely pathogen, individual risk factors, comorbidities, and allergies. Patients aged 65 years or older are often treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate or with another broad-spectrum antibiotic (third-generation cephalosporins, antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone). However, broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in CAP is debated and concerns exist about side-effects and selective pressure for resistance. Due to lack of head-to-head antibiotic comparisons, a recent Cochrane review concluded that current evidence from Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) is insufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for the choice for antibiotic to be used, highlighting an important evidence gap.

Detailed description

Thus, the goal of the proposed trial is to compare clinical efficacy and safety of two CAP antimicrobial treatments, amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in patients aged 65 years or older and hospitalized in a non-intensive care unit (ICU) ward. The CAPTAIN study will be a multi-center, randomized, open, non-inferiority trial comparing clinical efficacy at Day 30 among patients ≥65 years of age, and hospitalized in a non-ICU ward, treated with narrow-spectrum (amoxicillin) versus broad-spectrum (amoxicillin/clavulanate) antimicrobial therapy for CAP. This will be a pivotal clinical trial that will provide evidence to inform CAP treatment guidelines.

Interventions

DRUGAmoxicillin

Participants will be randomized to IV/oral amoxicillin or IV/oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for 5 days. Both agents are approved for treatment of respiratory infections. Amoxicillin PO: The dose is two capsule of 500 mg every 8 hours (that is 3 times daily). Amoxicillin IV: The dose is 1 g every 8 hours (that is 3 times daily)

Participants will be randomized to IV/oral amoxicillin or IV/oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for 5 days. Both agents are approved for treatment of respiratory infections. Amoxicillin/clavulanate PO: The dose is two tablets of 500 mg/62.5 mg every 8 hours (that is 3 times daily, approved standard dose) Amoxicillin/clavulanate IV: The dose is 1 g/200 mg every 8 hours (that is 3 times daily, approved standard dose)

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Drug study, multi-centre, Phase 3, Controlled , Randomized, Open, Prospective

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient aged 65 years or older with or without comorbidities defined by chronic diseases in immunocompetent patients, 2. Patient admitted to the hospital for a CAP defined by at least two clinical signs of pneumonia (cough, sputum production, dyspnea, tachypnea, or pleuritic pain, abnormal lung auscultatory sounds, fever (temperature \> 38°C) or hypothermia (\<36°C)), and had radiological evidence of a new infiltrate confirming pneumonia 3. Patient understanding oral and written French 4. Written informed consent obtained from patient prior to participation in the study (if the patient is unable to express in writing: consent by a trusted person). 5. Patients should be able to call and to answer to a phone call or to be with a relative who can help him to call or to answer questions notably raised by a medical staff belonging to the investigational site

Exclusion criteria

1. Signs of severe CAP (abscess, massive pleural effusion, serious chronic respiratory insufficiency, ICU admission) 2. Patient requiring ICU admission, 3. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \< 30 ml/min, 4. Known immunosuppression (asplenia, neutropenia, agammaglobulinemia, transplant, myeloma, lymphoma, known HIV and CD4\<200/mm3), 5. Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 6. Life-threatening state expected to lead to possible imminent death, 7. Suspected atypical bacteria requiring combined antibiotics therapy, 8. Legionella suspected, 9. Subjects with clinical or epidemiological environment leading to suspect a healthcare associated pneumonia with antibiotic resistant pathogen (including long-term care facility) 10. Patient known to be colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterobacteriaceae in the respiratory tract, 11. Suspicion of aspiration pneumonia, 12. Administration of any antibiotic treatment for more than 24 hours before inclusion, 13. History of jaundice/hepatic impairment associated with amoxicillin/clavulanate acid, 14. History of bacterial pneumonia less than 1 month prior to study inclusion 15. History of hypersensitivity or allergy to beta-lactam or to any excipients included in study antibiotics, 16. Subject without health insurance, 17. Subject without home address or difficulty in terms of follow-up (vacation, job transfer, geographical distance, lack of motivation), 18. Patient under judicial protection, 19. Diagnosis confirmed of SAR-Cov2 infection (PCR Test, covid antigen rapid test, chest computed tomography (CT) scan), 20. Participation to another interventional study and having an exclusion period that is still in force during the screening phase or expected participation to another interventional study during participation to the CAPTAIN study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-inferiorityDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)To investigate non-inferiority in terms of clinical efficacy among patients aged 65 years or older, hospitalized in a non-ICU ward for a CAP, and treated with narrow-spectrum (amoxicillin) versus broad-spectrum (amoxicillin/clavulanate) antimicrobial therapy, at Day 30 since hospital admission. To answer this question, clinical success rate at Day 30 since admission, defined as survival after completion of antibiotic treatment course, resolution of signs and symptoms of the infection (cough, purulent sputum production, dyspnea, or pleuritic chest pain) present at baseline with no new symptoms or complications attributable to CAP and no need for further antibacterial therapy will be determined

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of early clinical responseDay 3 after inclusion (=Day 1)Early clinical response will be defined as survival with improvement of one or more levels relative to baseline in two or more symptoms of CAP and no worsening of one or more levels in other symptoms of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, without receipt of rescue antibacterial therapy
Clinical cure after the end of treatmentWithin 30 days after inclusion (=Day 1) compared to baselineThe proposed endpoint of clinical cure after the end of treatment is defined as resolution in relevant signs and symptoms reported at baseline, no worsening of symptoms, and no change in antimicrobial regimen
To investigate total duration of antibiotic treatment, i.e., the total number of days with antibiotics during the Day 30 follow-up after hospital admissionDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)Days taking antibiotics from the first dose until the interruption of any antibiotic treatment during hospitalization and at late follow-up at Day 30 after hospital admission (to identify the use of any other antibiotic after hospital discharge defined as no IV, regain of autonomy identical to baseline, good clinical response and favorable evolution following initiation of antibiotics, other criteria left at the discretion of the investigators according to centers' practices)
To investigate all-cause mortality at Day 30 after hospital admissionDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)All-cause mortality at Day 30 after hospital admission
To investigate the rate of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive Clostridium difficile among patients with diarrheaWithin 30 days after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive Clostridium difficile among patients with diarrhea
To investigate in-hospital mortalityWithin 30 days after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of deaths during hospitalization
To investigate ICU transfer during the Day 30 follow-upDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of patients transferred to the ICU during the Day 30 follow-up
To investigate CAP recurrence and hospital readmissions up to day 30 from hospital admissionDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of hospital readmissions and CAP recurrence up to day 30 from hospital admission
To investigate adverse events attributable to antibiotics up to day 30 from hospital admissionDay 30 after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of adverse events attributable to antibiotics and number of days with adverse events up to day 30 from hospital admission
To investigate compliance with the antibiotic treatmentWithin 7 days after inclusion (=Day 1)Number of days of antibiotic treatment taken
To investigate length of hospital stayWithin 30 days after inclusion (=Day 1)
Analysis of sensitivity todiscordanceWithin 30 days after inclusion (=Day 1)To investigate the agreement between the early clinical response endpoint and the investigator's clinical judgment: the agreement between early clinical response (main endpoint) and the investigator's clinical judgement (clinical success or clinical failure) will be assessed

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTEmmanuel MONTASSIER, Professor
emmanuel.montassier@chu-nantes.fr02 53 48 20 38
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrederic BALEN, Doctor

Toulouse UH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGuillaume MARTIN-BLONDEL, Doctor

Toulouse UH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPerrine DUMANOIR, Doctor

Grenoble Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVIGLINO Damien, Doctor

Grenoble Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlexandrine VIDAL, Doctor

Perigueux Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDelphine PLARD, Doctor

Angers UH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRafaël MAHIEU, Doctor

Angers UH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnne-Laure FERAL-PIERSSENS, Doctor

Avicenne AP-HP

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrederic MECHAI, Doctor

Avicenne AP-HP

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAurelie DAUMAS, Professor

Marseille Timone Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDominique MERRIEN, Doctor

CHD La Roche sur Yon

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSylvain LE GENTIL, Doctor

CHD La Roche sur Yon

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPierre BARSI, Doctor

Vannes Hospital Bretagne Atlantic

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRozenn LE BERRE, Doctor

Brest Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSylvain JAFFUEL, Doctor

Brest Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORXavier DUBUCS, Doctor

Toulouse UH

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthieu THIBAULT, Doctor

Saint-Nazaire Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBOISSEAU Dorothée, Doctor

Saint-Nazaire Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026