Early Pregnancy
Conditions
Brief summary
This clinical trial consisted of lay user study and method comparison study. Method comparison study: evaluate the clinical performance by comparing the results of new device and FDA cleared device (the comparator) tested on the same sample by professionals. Lay user study: evaluate the usability of by comparing the results of new device on the same sample tested by professionals and lay user, and by lay users complete the questionnaire.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Method comparison study
Exclusion criteria
* Female; * 18-55 years of age; * Voluntary and sign informed consent form. 2. Lay user study inclusion criteria * Female; * 18-55 years of age; * Voluntary and sign informed consent form; * Willingness to perform self-test of investigational device; * Have the ability to read English.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison results | 30minute | Compare the test results conducted by professionals using investigational device and the comparator, and the positive percent agreement (PPA=100%), negative percent agreement (NPA=100%) and overall percent agreement (OPA=100%) were calculated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the usability and user comprehension of investigational device | 30minute | The accuracy rate of the critical task is 100%. The Overall Percent Agreement for investigational device is 100% when conducted by a lay user. The accuracy rate of the each questions in the Knowledge assessment is 100%, and 100% of the Ease of operation assessment chose normal, easy, or very easy. |
Countries
China