Skip to content

Effect of Whole-body Vibration on the Ankle Joint, Plantar Pressure, and Running Paramethers

Effect of Whole-body Vibration on the Ankle Joint, Plantar Pressure, and Running Paramethers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06227312
Enrollment
16
Registered
2024-01-26
Start date
2022-11-14
Completion date
2022-12-22
Last updated
2024-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait, Range of Motion, Running

Keywords

runners, muscle flexibility, ankle, range of motion, foot arches, plantar pressure patterns, Footscan

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study was the assessment of whole-body vibration warm-up, modified drop jumps, and combination of both on the range of motion of dorsiflexion in the ankle joint and running time. 16 recreationally active runners performed 4 different warm-up variants one week apart: 5 sets of 30 s calf raises on the platform but without vibration (CTRL), the same as CTRL group but with vibration with 30 s rest intervals between sets (WBV), 6 drop jumps with a 30 s rest interval between sets (DJ); last group was combination of both WBV and DJ groups (WBV+DJ). The study included muscle flexibility tests for the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles performed before the warm-up, 3 minutes after warm-up and immediately after a 3000 m run on a treadmill. The running time was measured and the run had to be completed in the shortest possible time. Additionally, in the third week of the study there were performed static and dynamic foot measurements immediately before and after a 3000 m treadmill run. The main purpose of that gait analysis was to assess the impact of a 3km run on plantar pressure patterns and gait parameters in recreational runners.

Interventions

DEVICELADY 1 Pro, New Life Balance

whole-body vibration training on the platform

OTHERexercises

calf raises and modified drop jumps

Sponsors

Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The participants engaged in four experimental sessions within 4 weeks. These sessions were conducted in a randomized sequence, with a one-week gap between each session. During each session, every participant performed one of the following tasks: 5 sets of 30 s calf raises on the platform but without vibration (CTRL); 5 sets of 30 s calf raises on the vibration platform with 30 s rest intervals between sets (WBV); 6 drop jump with a 30 s rest interval between sets (DJ); 5 sets of 30 s calf raises on the vibration platform followed by 6 drop jumps with a 30 s rest interval between sets (WBV + DJ).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
34 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy and recreationally active males * minimum two years of running training experience

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatological disease * neurological disease * orthopaedic disease * genetic disease * cardiovascular system disease * pain in lower limbs in the last year * pain in lumbar spine in the last year * surgeries of lower limbs in the last year * surgeries of spine in the last year * musculoskeletal injuries in the lower limbs in the last year * musculoskeletal injuries in the lumbar spine in the last year * the absence during one or more training day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (Gastrocnemius muscle flexibility test)3 times - before the warm-up, 3 minutes after warm-up and immediately after a 3000 m runThe participant laid in a supine position with his knee straight and his ankle joint off the table. The researcher 1 tested the maximum dorsiflexion of the foot and controlled the position of the knee. The researcher 2 applied the AMI digital inclinometer (OPIW, Poland) to the outer edge of the foot. The The angle of dorsiflexion was measured in degrees.
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (Soleus muscle flexibility test)3 times - before the warm-up, 3 minutes after warm-up and immediately after a 3000 m runThe participant laid in a supine position with the knee bent 90 degrees. The researcher 1 performed passive maximum dorsiflexion of the foot. The researcher 2 applied the AMI digital inclinometer (OPIW, Poland) to the outer edge of the foot. The angle of dorsiflexion was measured in degrees.
Static foot analysis (FootScan platform)2 times - immediately before and after 3000 m runIn static measurement participants stood barefoot on the Footscan platform at a designated point, assuming a relaxed and natural position, remaining still and looking straight ahead with their arms by their sides. Static paramethers include the pressure of the parts of each foot (impulse - Ns/cm).
Dynamic foot analysis (FootScan platform) 12 times - immediately before and after 3000 m runDuring dynamic measurement participants were asked to walk barefoot in a relaxed manner at a self-selected comfort speed, and not to look at the ground. Dynamic parametrers include foot pressure (impulse - Ns/cm).
Dynamic foot analysis (FootScan platform) 22 times - immediately before and after 3000 m runDuring dynamic measurement participants were asked to walk barefoot in a relaxed manner at a self-selected comfort speed, and not to look at the ground. Dynamic parametrers include gait speed (m/s).
Dynamic foot analysis (FootScan platform) 32 times - immediately before and after 3000 m runDuring dynamic measurement participants were asked to walk barefoot in a relaxed manner at a self-selected comfort speed, and not to look at the ground. Dynamic parametrers include walking time (s).

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026