Skip to content

Comparison of Outcome Between (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods in Elective CS

Comparison of Outcome Between the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Protocol (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06225557
Acronym
ERACS
Enrollment
106
Registered
2024-01-26
Start date
2024-03-10
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ERAS

Brief summary

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient's outcome measures.

Detailed description

The study is designed to evaluate the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol during elective cesarean section on patient outcome measures. The primary outcome is the evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 11 score (ObsQoR-11) at the time of discharge. Secondary outcomes are the evaluation of peak numeric postoperative pain rating score within the postoperative hospital stay, total amount of postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea, and vomiting impact score after 6 hours postoperatively and at time of discharge, patient satisfaction using Leiden perioperative care patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) at time of discharge, presence of post-cesarean ileus and Hospital length to achieve criteria for discharge.

Interventions

OTHERERAS community recommendation

Enhanced recovery techniques including opioid sparing anesthesia in elective cesarean section

Usual anesthesia and analgesia in elective cesarean section.

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

follow ERAS society guidelines recommendations in elective CESAREAN SECTION

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women ASA I to ASA II aged from 18 up to 40 years. With non-complicated pregnancy undergoing elective CS.

Exclusion criteria

* -Age less than 18 years * Complications (wound infection, re-exploration, caesarean hysterectomies) * Recent documented use of opioids Allergy to any drug used during the study.- * Patients with severe heart diseases, cardiac arrhythmia and myocardial injury. * uncontrolled diabetic patient * Severe liver and kidney diseases * Coagulation defect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Obstetric Quality of Recovery 11 score (ObsQoR-11)before discharge or during 24 hour postoperativelyit is consisted of 11 questions covers four domains of recovery outcomes: physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence and care of the neonate, and pain ,each question taking score from 0 to 10 with 0 is the minimum score and 10 is the highest score and the maximum total score is 110 and the minimum total is 0 which is the worest quality of recovery

Contacts

Primary ContactMarwa AA Mohamed, AS Lecturer
marwaelhelaly@hotmail.com00201005431155
Backup ContactHaidy SM Mansour, AS professor
haydi.mansour@mu.edu.eg00201221802324

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026