Skip to content

Novel Interventions and Diagnostic Tests for Leprosy

Monitoring the Effect of Prophylactic Interventions in Contacts of Leprosy Patients Including Field-application of a Novel Immunodiagnostic Test in Bangladesh

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06222372
Acronym
INDIGO#2
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2024-01-24
Start date
2020-03-04
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leprosy

Keywords

leprosy, diagnostics, SDR, post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), biomarkers, UCP-LFA

Brief summary

Contact with Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) infected individuals is a risk factor for development of leprosy. Thus, detection of asymtomatically M. leprae infected individuals, allowing informed decision making on who needs treatment at a preclinical stage, is vital to interrupt transmission and can help prevent leprosy. In a previous field trial the BCG vaccine was applied alone and combined with a single dose of rifampin (SDR) as prophylactic interventions in contacts of leprosy patients in Bangladesh. Concurrently, blood-derived host immune-profiles specific for M. leprae infection or leprosy disease were assessed in the same population by merging detection of innate, adaptive cellular as well as humoral immunity. This has led to the identification of selected host-immune markers, currently applied in a low complexity lateral flow assay based on up-coverting particles (UCP-LFA), providing a convenient tool to assess M. leprae infection, allowing assessment of efficacy of prophylactic interventions in a point-of-care setting. The proposed study aims to determine the effect of post-exposure prophylaxis by SDR on M. leprae infection rate using UCP-LFA before and after prophylaxis.

Detailed description

A stable leprosy new case detection rate in many endemic countries indicates that the transmission of M. leprae is continuing unabated and that the current control strategy of case finding and provision of multi drug therapy (MDT) is not sufficient. Immunoprophylaxis by vaccination or post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with antibiotics provide effective strategies for the prevention of leprosy. Prophylactic treatment with single dose rifampicin (SDR) has shown to be a successful method to prevent leprosy in contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients (1). Currently, the Leprosy Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (LPEP) program generates evidence on the feasibility of integrating contact tracing and single-dose rifampicin (SDR) administration into routine leprosy control activities within the national leprosy control programmes of Brazil, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Tanzania \[Steinmann P, et al\]. Recently, the world health orginazation (WHO) has endorsed PEP for routine application in their new Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of leprosy. Genomic and transcriptomics analysis (e.g. population- and twin studies \[5\]), have determined that the host genetic background is an important risk factor for leprosy susceptibility. In addition, close contacts of leprosy patients have a higher risk of developing the disease (2, 3), which therefore represents the primary target group for interventions (4). To target individuals spreading leprosy bacilli for prophylactic treatment, M. leprae infection needs to be measurable objectively. Antibody levels correspond with bacterial load and risk of transmission. Also, individuals seropositive for anti-M. leprae phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) antibodies, are at 5-8 fold higher risk of leprosy (5, 6). Moreover, in a leprosy endemic area in Bangladesh, we recently showed significant added value of cellular markers (cytokines, chemokines, acute phase proteins) to identify infection (7). Thus, for implementation in a PEP-approach, new tests that indicate who needs treatment should allow detection of both cellular-and humoral markers. In previous studies applying UCP-LFA in 4 countries with variable leprosy endemicity (Bangladesh, Brazil, China and Ethiopia), we have shown that the combined assessment of serum levels of multiple biomarkers including anti-PGL-I Ab as well as cytokines, significantly improved the diagnostic potential for detection of M. leprae infected individuals. This demonstrates that UCP-LFAs for detection of multiple biomarkers can provide valuable tools for more accurate detection of M. leprae infection. Its low-complexity POC format and applicability for use of finger-stick blood allows large scale screening efforts in field settings. Moreover, the format of the UCP-LFA is being further developed in various other projects (focused on tuberculosis and leprosy diagnostic tests). This has recently resulted in a multi-biomarker test (MBT) format that allows simultaneous detection of up to 6 markers, which is currently further evaluated in the field for tuberculosis diagnostic purposes. Since the UCP-LFA format is flexible and can accommodate for detection of different markers, this latest development will also enable combined detection of humoral and cellular biomarkers which together represent a specific signature for M. leprae infection.

Interventions

DRUGRifampin

antibiotic

Sponsors

The Leprosy Mission Bangladesh
CollaboratorOTHER
Annemieke Geluk
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

As an additional feature of this sub-study, we will test two SDR regimens. One regimen will be the until now standard SDR regimen of 600 mg rifampicin for adults weighing 35 kg and over, 450 mg for adults weighing less than 35 kg and for children older than 9 years, and 300 mg for children aged 5 to 9 years. The other regimen will be double this dose (1200 mg rifampicin for adults weighing 35 kg and over, 900 mg for adults weighing less than 35 kg and for children older than 9 years, and 600 mg for children aged 5 to 9 years). The patients and their contact group will be equally allocated through randomization to one of the two SDR regimen groups.

Intervention model description

Contacts of new MB leprosy patients with a bacterial index (BI) of 2 or more will be included. To determine the effect of SDR on M. leprae infection rate using UCP-LFA prospectively, SDR will be administered to 10 contacts of the new leprosy patients (n=100). M. leprae infection will be determined for each patient and contact by finger stick UCP-LFA for multiplex detection of anti-M. leprae antibodies and cytokines at time points 0 (intake), 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after SDR (n=4,400). Contacts will include both household and neighbor contacts.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

patients: \- newly diagnosed multibacillary leprosy patients (BI 1-6) Inclusion Criteria contacts of MB leprosy patients: * living in the same house (household members) * living in a house on the same compound * sharing the same kitchen * direct neighbors (first neighbors) * willing to participate * provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

patients: * refusal of examination of their contacts * suffering from the pure neural form of leprosy * residing only temporarily in the study area * PB leprosy patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of levels of host serum proteins in contacts after SDRsamples will be analysed 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after SDRUsing UCP-LFA levels of biomarkers will be quantified in fingerprick blood samples
Changes of levels of host serum proteins in contacts after SDDRsamples will be analysed 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after SDDRUsing UCP-LFA levels of biomarkers will be quantified in fingerprick blood samples

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in bacterial load in contacts after SDRsamples will be analysed 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after SDRdetermining M.leprae DNA in nasal swabs
Changes in bacterial load in contacts after SDDRsamples will be analysed 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after SDDRdetermining M.leprae DNA in nasal swabs

Countries

Bangladesh

Contacts

Primary ContactAnnemieke Geluk, PhD
ageluk@lumc.nl+31715261974
Backup ContactAnouk van Hooij, PhD
A.van_Hooij@lumc.nl+31715263844

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026