Skip to content

Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Surgical Clerkship

Objective Assessment of Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Simple Wound Suturing Skill to Surgical Clerkship

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06221917
Acronym
LS vs FTF
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-01-24
Start date
2024-01-09
Completion date
2024-04-10
Last updated
2024-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Teaching Method

Keywords

Teaching method, Live-streaming, Face-to-face, Simple wound suturing

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess objectively whether teaching for simple wound sutures via Live-Streaming (LS) using Go-pro® has the same effectiveness as the traditional Face-to-face (FTF) teaching. The main question it aims to answer is whether training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training. After initially doing pre-test, participants will be randomized into two groups: LS and FTF. After teaching exposure, the participants will be given 1 week period of self-training to master the skill (as such procedural skills require a period of self training before we examine the effect of teaching exposure). Afterwards, they underwent post-test again with the previously same examiner, using the same OSCE rubric to avoid bias. Researchers will compare if the LS and FTF groups to see if training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training.

Interventions

FTF group are participants who will learn simple sutures physically present with the instructor in the same room.

OTHERLive-streaming

One general surgeon (FH) will teach the participants how to do simple sutures on a mannequin, starting by explaining, then doing a live-demo step-by-step of simple wound suturing. The instructor uses a GoPro Hero 8 device on her head which is connected to the internet and produced live-streaming video, which will then be watched by LS group.

Sponsors

Pelita Harapan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Surgery clerkships * Willing to participate voluntarily and give consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who drop out between 1 week period of pre-test and post-test * Participants not willing to be involved in the teaching exposure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-test Scores1 week after teachingPost-test Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scores Value ranges from 0 to 60. Higher score means better outcome, and vice versa.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Differences of Pre-test and Post-test (Delta)1 week after teachingNumerical differences of Pre- and Post-Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scores (Delta) Value ranges from -60 to 60. Higher numerical difference means better outcome, and vice versa.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026