Centric Relation Registration
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to quantify the differences in the diagnostic relationships between Centric occlusion versus maximum intercuspation in adult orthodontic patients with Cetric relation recoded using both conventional method utilizing semi-adjustable articulator and face bow record in addition to digital method proposed by Radu et al for finding and recording CR using a dental intraoral scanner with a leaf gauge
Detailed description
Study design Cross-sectional study PICO Components P: Adult orthodontic patient I: Centric occlusion C: Maximum intercuspation O: -orthodontic relations: Molar relation Canine relation Incisor relation Overjet Overbite Midline discrepancy
Interventions
centric relation registration using conventional and digital methods
maximum intercuspation registration
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
orthodontic patient having full permanent dentition
Exclusion criteria
* patients who had undergone previous orthodontic treatment, and syndromic patients, retained primary teeth , teeth heavily restored
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| overjet | 1 day between the maximum intercuspation and centric relation records | overjet change measurement in millimeter |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| overbite | 1 day between the maximum intercuspation and centric relation records records | measurement in millimeter |
| midline shift | 1 day between the 2 records | superimposition of both centric relation and maximum intercuspation digitally |
| incisor relation | 1 day between the maximum intercuspation and centric relation records records | measurement in millimeter |
Countries
Egypt