Skip to content

Low Level Laser Therapy for Better Wound Healing

Prospective Double Blind Controlled Trial of Low Level Laser Therapy - Cesarean Section or Vaginal Tear or Episiotomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06220786
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-01-24
Start date
2023-12-19
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2024-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Scar Tissue of Cesarean Section or Vaginal Tear or Episiotomy

Brief summary

Prospective randomized double blind study. Intervention 1: Low-level laser therapy ca. 72 Joules vs. Intervention 2: No Low-level laser therapy. Outcome: Pain score & would healing at discharge, 1 months & 3 months

Detailed description

After surgical suture application of low level laser therapy of ca. 72 Joules / cm2. Evaluation at discharge, after 1 months & 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICELow-level laser therapy

Low-level laser therapy ca. 72 Joules per cm2

DEVICEFake low-level laser therapy

Identical laser pen without production of low-level laser therapy

Sponsors

St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus Frankfurt GmbH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Blinding of the two laser pens is in place till all patient data has been collected.

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized double blind study. Intervention 1: Low-level laser therapy ca. 72 Joules vs. Intervention 2: No Low-level laser therapy. Doctors & Patients do not kown which laser is the true laser or the fake laser

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Caesarean section or perineal tear grade 1-4 or episiotomy * competent in German language

Exclusion criteria

* no caesarean section or birth without perineal tear grad 1-4 / episiotomy * No consent given

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scoreQuestionnaire 3 to 4 days after birth, after 1 month after birth & after 3 months after birthVisual analog scale (1= no pain; 10 = severe pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective would healingQuestionnaire 3 to 4 days after birth, after 1 month after birth & after 3 months after birthVisual analog scale (1= very good healing; 10 = very bad would healing)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactJoscha Reinhard, Prof. Dr.
Joscha.Reinhard@artemed.de+49 69-7939
Backup ContactMidwifes
+49 69-7939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026