Child, Only, Quality of Life
Conditions
Keywords
Hall technique, Paediatric dentistry, Stainless Steel
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare the change on occlusion after placing stainless steel crowns (SCC) using Hall technique and conventional technique in children between the ages of 5-8. In addition, the investigators planned to analyze the change in oral health-related quality of life between SCC applied with the Hall technique and SCC applied with the conventional method, before and after clinical application.
Detailed description
First, the participants who met the inclusion criteria were included in 2 study groups according to age, gender, dental experience, tooth number, applied stainless steel crown technique, Decayed, Missing due to caries, and Filled teeth in the permanent teeth/decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth in the deciduous teeth (DMFT/dmft index) values and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) and radiographic evaluation criteria. In the experimental group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using the Hall technique. In the control group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using conventional technique.
Interventions
PROCEDUREHall technique
Prepless crown technique
PROCEDUREConventional technique
1 or 1,5 mm preparation on mesial, distal and occlusal of the tooth
Sponsors
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Randomization was performed by a computer-generated random sorting sequence
Intervention model description
Randomized controlled, double-blind clinical trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects with American Society of Anesthesiologists score I (ASA I), * Subjects with Frankl's behavior rate III (positive) and IV (definitely positive), * Clinically, Black class II enamel-dentin caries in the upper jaw primary second molar is; ICDAS II Scale score 4, score 5 and the accepted values in the evaluation of radiographic dental caries are D1-RA3, D2-RB4, D3-RC5, * Antagonist of the tooth planned to be processed, * Lamina dura and periodontal space can be observed normally * There is permanent tooth germ underneath or the position is normal.
Exclusion criteria
* Allergic to the local anesthetics or sulfites, * Had teeth with pain or sepsis, * Were uncooperative during clinical examination, * TMJ disorder, * Had parafunctional habit
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The measurement of intrusion of teeth with stainless steel crown applied with conventional technique using Gom Inspect | Immediately before the procedure and one month control | 0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means extrusion |
| The measurement of intrusion of teeth with stainless steel crown applied with Hall technique using Gom Inspect | Immediately before the procedure and one month control | Intrusion scores in Hall technique 0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means intrusion |
| Change from measurement the distance between the cusps of canines with stainless steel crown applied with Hall technique using Exocad | Immediately before the procedure and one month control | 0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure |
| Change from measurement the distance between the cusps of canines with stainless steel crown applied with conventional technique using Exocad | Immediately before the procedure and one month control | 0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring the impact of stainless steel crowns on oral health and quality of life in children section with the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale | Immediately after the procedure and one month control | Child sections have a possible range from 0 to 36. 0=Never or hardly ever 36= Occasionally, often, or very often |
| Measuring the impact of stainless steel crowns on oral health and quality of life in parents section with the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale | Immediately after the procedure and one month control | Family sections have a possible range from 0 to 16. 0=Never or hardly ever 16= Occasionally, often, or very often |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed