Skip to content

Neurobiological Drivers of Mobility Resilience: The Dopaminergic System - Placebo-Controlled Arm

Neurobiological Drivers of Mobility Resilience: The Dopaminergic System

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06219915
Acronym
RES
Enrollment
13
Registered
2024-01-23
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2024-05-30
Last updated
2025-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinsonian Signs in Older Persons

Keywords

slow gait, Parkinsonian signs

Brief summary

Walking with age becomes both slower and less 'automated', requiring more attention and brain resources. As a result, older adults have a greater risk of negative outcomes and falls. There is an urgent need to identify factors that can help compensate for these harmful factors and reduce walking impairments, as there are currently no effective treatments available. Investigators have recently discovered that \ 20% of older adults maintain fast walking speed even in the presence of small blood vessel brain changes and leg problems, thus appearing to be protected against these harmful factors. The investigators work suggests that the brain dopamine (DA) system may be a source of this protective capacity. Investigators have also shown that lower levels of dopamine are associated with slow walking. Investigators will be investigating the role of dopamine on slow walking and other parkinsonian signs in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study using detailed clinical assessment, assessment of dopamine activity, and clinical interventions.

Detailed description

Walking with age becomes both slower and less 'automated', requiring more attention and prefrontal resources. As a result older adults have a greater risk of adverse mobility outcomes and falls. Walking disturbances in the elderly have been linked to changes in both cerebral, in particular small vessel disease (cSVD), and peripheral systems. There is an urgent need to identify factors that can help compensate for these harmful factors and reduce walking impairments, as there are currently no effective treatments available. Although effective mobility is the end result of the functional capacity of both central and peripheral systems, the brain's unique modulatory and adaptive capacity may provide clues for novel interventions. For example, investigators have recently discovered that \ 20% of older adults maintain fast walking speed even in the presence of age related cSVD and peripheral system impairments, thus appearing resilient to these harmful factors. The investigators work suggests that the nigrostriatal dopamine (DA) system may be a source of this resilience. As investigators recent findings suggest, DA neurotransmission positively predicts walking speed; it also attenuates the negative effects of age related cSVD and peripheral system impairments on walking speed. These findings are consistent with post-mortem evidence that a combination of loss of nigral DA neurons and cSVD best predict age-related walking impairment. The nigrostriatal DA system plays a critical role in motor control; nigrostriatal. DA neurotransmission regulates the automated execution of overlearned motor tasks via its connections with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical areas. The investigators hypothesize that higher nigrostriatal DA neurotransmission drives resilience to cSVD and peripheral system impairments, via higher connectivity of sensorimotor networks, thus increasing automaticity of walking and reducing prefrontal engagement while walking. Unlike cSVD and brain structural impairments, DA neurotransmission is potentially modifiable, thereby offering novel approaches to treat non-resilient elderly in a targeted fashion. This study is an arm of a previously completed translational pilot biomechanistic target engagement study in older adults with slow walking and/or parkinsonian signs (NCT04325503). This sub-study will further investigate this biomechanistic target engagement using a double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. The study will include elderly men and women age 60 or older with evidence of mild parkinsonian signs (MPS, or slow gait (\< 1m/s)).

Interventions

Participants will take one 25mg Carbidopa tablet 3 times a day for 10 days.

Participants will take one 25/100mg carbidopa-levodopa tablet 3 times a day on days 4-6, then increase to 1.5 tablets 3 times a day on days 7-10.

DRUGPlacebo 1

Participants will take one 25mg placebo tablet 3 times a day for 10 days.

DRUGPlacebo 2

Participants will take one 100mg placebo tablet 3 times a day on days 4-6, then increase to 1.5 tablets 3 times a day on days 7-10.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 60 or older (M/F) * Evidence of mild parkinsonian signs (incl. slow gait (\<1m/s))

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of prior established diagnosis and/or treatment for PD. * Presence of clinically significant degenerative joint disease and/or neuropathy interfering with proper assessment of the motor exam. * Presence of significant dementia. * History of stroke with residual clinical deficit interfering with walking. * For optional MR imaging only: Participants in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is contraindicated including, but not limited to, those with a pacemaker, presence of metallic fragments near the eyes or spinal cord, or cochlear implant. * For optional brain imaging only: Severe claustrophobia precluding neuroimaging procedures. * Participants that have been on monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within 2 weeks prior to starting study. * Inability to stand or walk without an assistive device * Hypersensitivity to the carbidopa, levodopa, and tablet components. * History of myocardial infarction (MI) with residual arterial, nodal or ventricular arrhythmia * History of peptic ulcer * Chronic wide angle glaucoma * Narrow angle glaucoma * Major psychotic disorder * Severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma, renal, hepatic or endocrine disease * Subjects on dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, dopamine depleting agents, and metoclopramide. * Any other medical history determined by investigators to preclude safe participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Gait SpeedBaseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)Average gait speed as measured using wearable sensors and while walking on a sensor mat. Measured in meters per second.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale ScoreBaseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)Cognitive scale designed to capture impairments in cognitive function in Parkinson's disease. (Scoring: 0-134, with higher scores indicating better performance).
Mean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)During this test, subjects make steps based on congruent (stimulus prompts the stepping response) and incongruent (stimulus prompts inhibition of the stepping response) arrows and sounds. This will be used to compare the number of incorrect responses (stepping) from pre and post intervention visits to determine if inhibitory control improves (indicated by decrease in number of incorrect responses). The test included 8 total opportunities for response.
Mean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)During this test, subjects make steps based on congruent (stimulus prompts the stepping response) and incongruent (stimulus prompts inhibition of the stepping response) arrows and sounds. This will be used to compare the response time between pre and post intervention to determine if reaction time improves.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were considered enrolled once they signed a consent form. While thirteen participants were consented and therefore enrolled, two failed their screening post-consent. Eleven were randomized and participated in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-Levodopa
Participants will begin by taking 25mg of Carbidopa monotherapy three times per day (TID) for 3 days. On day four, participants will begin taking 1 tablet of Carbidopa-Levodopa (25/100mg) TID in addition to the Carbidopa monotherapy. On day seven, participants will increase to 1.5 tablets of Carbidopa-Levodopa (25/100mg) TID while maintaining 25mg Carbidopa monotherapy TID. The intervention will end after ten days of supplementation. Carbidopa 25 mg: Participants will take one 25mg Carbidopa tablet 3 times a day for 10 days. Carbidopa-Levodopa 25/100 mg: Participants will take one 25/100mg carbidopa-levodopa tablet 3 times a day on days 4-6, then increase to 1.5 tablets 3 times a day on days 7-10.
6
Placebo
Participants will begin by taking a 25mg placebo tablet three times per day (TID) for 3 days. On day four, participants will begin taking a separate placebo tablet TID in addition to the original placebo. On day seven, participants will increase to 1.5 tablets of the second placebo TID while maintaining 25mg original placebo TID. The intervention will end after ten days of supplementation. Placebo 1: Participants will take one 25mg placebo tablet 3 times a day for 10 days. Placebo 2: Participants will take one 100mg placebo tablet 3 times a day on days 4-6, then increase to 1.5 tablets 3 times a day on days 7-10.
5
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCarbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous79.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
77.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
76.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 63 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Average Gait Speed

Average gait speed as measured using wearable sensors and while walking on a sensor mat. Measured in meters per second.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaAverage Gait SpeedGait Speed at Baseline0.97 meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.14
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaAverage Gait SpeedGait Speed Post-Intervention1.04 meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboAverage Gait SpeedGait Speed at Baseline0.86 meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboAverage Gait SpeedGait Speed Post-Intervention0.95 meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Mean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping Test

During this test, subjects make steps based on congruent (stimulus prompts the stepping response) and incongruent (stimulus prompts inhibition of the stepping response) arrows and sounds. This will be used to compare the number of incorrect responses (stepping) from pre and post intervention visits to determine if inhibitory control improves (indicated by decrease in number of incorrect responses). The test included 8 total opportunities for response.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaMean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline0.17 Incorrect ResponsesStandard Deviation 0.41
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaMean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestPost-Intervention0.17 Incorrect ResponsesStandard Deviation 0.41
PlaceboMean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline0.8 Incorrect ResponsesStandard Deviation 1.79
PlaceboMean of Number of Incorrect Responses on the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestPost-Intervention0.4 Incorrect ResponsesStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Mean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping Test

During this test, subjects make steps based on congruent (stimulus prompts the stepping response) and incongruent (stimulus prompts inhibition of the stepping response) arrows and sounds. This will be used to compare the response time between pre and post intervention to determine if reaction time improves.

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaMean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline1.84 secondsStandard Deviation 0.08
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaMean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestPost-Intervention1.85 secondsStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboMean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestBaseline2.26 secondsStandard Deviation 0.41
PlaceboMean of Reaction Time During the Stroop Color Word Stepping TestPost-Intervention1.91 secondsStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Parkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale Score

Cognitive scale designed to capture impairments in cognitive function in Parkinson's disease. (Scoring: 0-134, with higher scores indicating better performance).

Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (7-13 days after beginning supplement)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaParkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale ScorePost-Intervention95.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Carbidopa Monotherapy and Carbidopa-LevodopaParkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale ScoreBaseline93.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.91
PlaceboParkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale ScoreBaseline89.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
PlaceboParkinson's Disease (PD)-Cognitive Rating Scale ScorePost-Intervention95.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.52

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026