Skip to content

Reinnervation and Neuromuscular Transmission in ALS

Reinnervation and Neuromuscular Transmission in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06219759
Acronym
RANTAL
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-01-23
Start date
2024-05-17
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to describe the changes in the neuromuscular connection in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The study consist of three substudies that have the following main hypothesis: 1. that ALS patients do not demonstrate equal capacity for muscle reinnervation and that reinnervation preserves muscle function and thereby slows down progression. 2. that blood concentrations of c-terminal agrin fragment (bCAF) reflect neuromuscular transmission deficiency and that blood concentration of neural cell adhesion molecule reflects degree of muscle denervation in patients. 3. that ALS patients with decrement when examined with repetitive nerve stimulation have more physical fatigue, slower progression, higher degree of reinnervation and higher bCAF compared to ALS patients without decrement. There will be 3 inclusion groups. 1. patients referred for neurophysiological examination on suspicion of motor neuron disease. 2. healthy controls 3. disease control: patients with another motor neuron disease with slow progression. All participants will be invited for at least 1 visit (baseline). If participants in group 1 eventually receive the diagnosis of ALS they will be invited for 2 additional visits 4 og 8 months after baseline visit, respectively. Examinations will consist of: * nerve conduction study * repetitive nerve stimulation (except for healthy controls) to examine impairment of the neuromuscular connection. * motor unit number estimation with MScanFit to estimate number and size of motor units. * ultrasound examination of muscles to measure size and condition of muscles. * questionnaires on fatigue and functional status. * blood sample for measurement of specialized analysis (c-terminal agrin fragment and neural cell adhesion molecule) and routine analysis (liver and kidney function as well as neurofilament light chain) * muscle strength assessment manually and by dynamometer to follow progression of muscle weakness * bioelectrical impedance measurement to follow the overall body composition.

Interventions

OTHERObservational study

Observational study.

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Referred to clinical neurophysiological examination on suspicion of motor neuron disease or diagnosed with ALS according to Gold Coast criteria within the last 3 months. * Age ≥18 years old * Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Former central or peripheral nervous system disease * Diabetes * Electrophysiological signs of polyneuropathy at baseline visit * Pacemaker * Pregnancy For disease controls the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ReinnervationFrom baseline and 8 monthsDifference between fast and slow progressing patients in change in mean amplitude size of motor units as estimated by MScanFit motor unit number estimation.
Blood biomarkersBaselineDifference in blood concentration of c-terminal agrin fragment and neural cell adhesion molecule at baseline between ALS patients, healthy controls and ALS mimic disease patients.
Fatigue and decrementBaselineDifference in proportion of participants with decrement between ALS patients and ALS mimic disease patients as well as degree of fatigue among ALS patients with and without neuromuscular transmission deficiency.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle strength assessed with manual muscle strength testingBaseline, 4 months and 8 months.Difference in measures from manual muscle strength testing.
Difference in isometric ankle dorsiflexion strength measured on dynamometer.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Measured on dynamometer.
Difference in handgrip strength measured on dynamometer.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Measured with handgrip dynamometer.
Correlation between decrement at repetitive nerve stimulation and signs of reinnervation as measured by mean amplitude size.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Decrement measured with repetitive nerve stimulation and mean amplitude size measured with MScanFit technique.
Blood concentration of c-terminal agrin fragment and neural cell adhesion molecule.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Difference in blood measurements of c-terminal agrin fragment, neural cell adhesion molecule, neurofilament light chain and routine kidney and liver markers.
Difference in mean amplitude size over time in patients.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Mean amplitude size measured by MScanFit technique.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised scoresBaseline, 4 months and 8 months.Difference in scores from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised. Scale 0-48, with 48 being the best.
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory scoresBaseline, 4 months and 8 months.Difference in scores from Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Scale 4-20, with 20 indicating worst degree of fatigue.
Fatigue Severity Scale scoresBaseline, 4 months and 8 months.Difference in scores from Fatigue Severity Scale. Scale 9-63, with 63 indicating worst degree of fatigue.
Difference in free fatt mass as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Difference in muscle thickness as measured by ultrasound examination of musclesBaseline, 4 months and 8 months.Measured by ultrasound examination.
Difference in motor unit number estimation over time in patients.Baseline, 4 months and 8 months.Motor unit number estimation measured by MScanFit technique.
Difference in mean amplitude size between patients and control groupsBaseline.Mean amplitude size measured by MScanFit technique.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactJesper Storgaard, MD
jesstg@rm.dk004520231903

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026