Skip to content

Effect of Core Training on Physical Fitness and Smash Performance Among Female Badminton Players in Guangxi, China

Effect of Core Training on Physical Fitness and Smash Performance Among Female Badminton Players in Guangxi, China

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06219070
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-01-23
Start date
2024-02-05
Completion date
2024-08-05
Last updated
2024-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Athletes

Keywords

Core training, Physical fitness, Smash performance, Female badminton Players

Brief summary

The performance of Chinese women's badminton singles players is declining to a large extent, the training of badminton in China needs to catch up, and the talent ladder has caused a fault. Badminton Routine training, the effect is not apparent . An essay on the impact of core training on athletes' skill performance was written by Luo; it proves that core strength training plays a positive role in a variety of sports; there is no study of female badminton players. Coaches or sports researchers can use this knowledge to manage the training load of badminton players better, thereby helping badminton players achieve better results in badminton training and competition.

Detailed description

Hibbs constructed the Model of Core Training and Potential Performance according to the theoretical framework of core strength training. This study intervention design part of the researchers referred to Greg Glassman's CrossFit training guide and theoretical framework of core strength training. Motion design source form Motion design source Diversified Training to Enhance Core Strength State General Administration of sport (Sport.gov.cn)and Khatoon wrote the article. The duration and frequency of intervention came from the review. It is found in reviewing the effect of core strength training on badminton players' performance is 8 weeks and 3 times. Therefore, this study adopted intervention for 8 weeks, 3 times a week. The subjects of this study are 18-22 years old female college elite badminton players, all of whom are national second-level and above athletes. This study employs a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (CRCT) design. The athletes were randomly assigned to two training sites and divided into experimental and control groups. The two groups had the same professional skills training content. The only difference was the physical training part. The training program of the two groups lasts 8 weeks, 3 times per week, and 1 hour per training. The experimental group performed core training, while the control group maintained routine training. In addition, the specific content of the routine training of the control group was the standard training plan of the school. The dependent variables measured in this study are physical fitness (strength, speed, endurance, agility, and flexibility) and killing the ball under different states, including in sit Smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, and back smash.

Interventions

OTHERCore straining

The experimental group received 12 weeks of core training, and the control group received 12 weeks of conventional training, 3 times/times Of the week. Each session lasts 60 minutes and includes warm-up, exercise, and relaxation.

Sponsors

Ma Shuzhen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Their information may need to be kept confidential

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18-22 years. 2. Chinese university female badminton players. 3. No sports injuries, such as ankle injuries or waist injuries. 4. Elite athlete

Exclusion criteria

1. Athletes who were systematically training their core strength. 2. Athletes with sports injuries such as ankle or waist injuries. 3. Who could not follow the entire training schedule for three months. 4. Students who work out regularly or have hobbies for extra physical exercise. 5. Students with physical or mental illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of strength among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionMeasure the distance of the standing long jump with a measuring tape in centimeters (cm).
Effects of endurance among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionRecorded the number of jumping ropes in 1 min.
Effects of Speed among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionUse a stopwatch to record the time taken by the athlete to run 20 times with a low center of gravity (measured in seconds)
Effects of agility among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionThe course measured 10 meters in length and 5 meters in width when it was set up on a basketball court. The start, finish line, and both turning points were indicated by four cones. Four more cones were positioned at equal intervals down the center. The distance between the central cones was 3.3 meters. To cross the finish line, the subjects were told to run as fast as they could around the course in the designated direction. Time spent recording (seconds)
Effects of flexibility among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionUse the sit-and-reach box. The score is recorded as the point where their fingertips reach the measurement scale. The range of motion is measured in cm.
Effects of In sit Smash among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionAccuracy and velocity test
Effects of Jump smash among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionThe athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Effects of move left smash among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionThe athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Effects of move right smash among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionThe athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Effects of back smash among college studentsPretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after interventionThe athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKim Geok Soh
kims@upm.edu.my+60 19-364 9715
Backup ContactShuzhen Ma
msz20210607@126.com18377336078

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026