Skip to content

Urothelial Cancer Screening in Individuals With Lynch Syndrome Using a Urine Tumor DNA Panel (LS-URO Study)

Urothelial Cancer Screening in Individuals With Lynch Syndrome Using a Urine Tumor DNA Panel (LS-URO Study)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06218433
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-01-23
Start date
2023-04-10
Completion date
2034-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lynch Syndrome, Urothelial Carcinoma

Keywords

Lynch syndrome, Hereditary cancer syndrome, Screening, Urothelial neoplasms, Bladder neoplasms, Upper tract urothelial neoplasms, Urogenital diseases, Liquid biopsies, Urine tumor DNA

Brief summary

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. New cancer screening and diagnostic tools are urgently needed to identify LS-related cancers early enough for curative treatment. Urothelial cancers (comprising bladder and upper tract urothelial tumors) are the third most common cancer after colorectal and endometrial cancers in individuals with LS. Up to one in four LS individuals will develop urothelial cancer during their lifetime, with the risk varying based on the defective MMR gene. In this clinical trial, we will employ urine tumor DNA (utDNA) to identify asymptomatic urothelial cancers in Lynch syndrome patients, and to investigate the potential benefits of urine tumor DNA based screening in this high-risk population.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUrothelial cancer screening using urine tumor DNA test

Urine sample DNA is analyzed using a targeted sequencing panel encompassing the coding regions of 21 genes that are recurrently mutated in urothelial cancer

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUrothelial cancer screening using urine cytology (comparator)

Urine cytology sample

Sponsors

Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to provide informed consent * Diagnosis of Lynch syndrome * Age 50 - 75 years at study recruitment

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent urothelial carcinoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of positive utDNA for urothelial cancer within one year of follow-upAt 1 years of follow-upSensitivity and specificity of positive utDNA for urothelial cancer, using histologically verified cancers detected within 1 year of the utDNA test as ground truth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urothelial cancer specific survivalAt 3, 5 and 10 years of follow-upUrothelial cancer specific survival survival in utDNA positive and negative patients
Time to diagnosis of urothelial cancerAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upTime to diagnosis of urothelial cancer in utDNA positive and negative patients
TNM pathological stage of urothelial cancersAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upTNM pathological stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC)) of urothelial cancers found in utDNA positive and negative patients
Size of urothelial tumorsAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upMaximum diameter of urothelial tumors found in utDNA positive and negative patients
Urothelial cancer gradeAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upThe World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading of urothelial cancers found in utDNA positive and negative patients
Specificity of positive utDNA for urothelial cancer at the time of testingAfter all patients with positive utDNA have been evaluated with cystoscopy and/or imagingSpecificity of positive utDNA test for urothelial cancer, using histologically verified cancers detected in the cystoscopy and/or imaging performed due to positive utDNA test as the ground truth
Sensitivity and specificity of positive utDNA for urothelial cancer within multiple years of follow-upAt 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-upSensitivity and specificity of positive utDNA for urothelial cancer, using histologically verified cancers detected within 2, 5, and 10 years of the utDNA test as ground truth
Overall survivalAt 5 and 10 years of follow-upOverall survival in utDNA positive and negative patients
Time to metastatic urothelial cancerAt 5 and 10 years of follow-upTime to metastatic urothelial cancer in utDNA positive and negative patients
Time to diagnosis of muscle invasive or high grade urothelial cancerAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upTime to diagnosis of muscle invasive or high grade urothelial cancer in utDNA positive and negative patients

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of somatic second hit in MMR genesAt 1, 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upPrevalence of somatic second hit and additional somatic hits in mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2) in Lynch syndrome patients diagnosed with urothelial cancer
Cost of utDNA screeningAt 1, 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upAnalysis of the cost of utDNA screening, including cost per urothelial cancer found
Association of utDNA fraction with time to diagnosis of urothelial cancerAt 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-upAssociation of utDNA fraction (quantified based on mutation allele fractions in urine DNA) with time to diagnosis of urothelial cancer
Sensitivity and specificity of urine cytologyAt 1 year of follow-upSensitivity and specificity of urine cytology for detecting urothelial cancer, using histologically verified cancers detected within 1 year of cytology as ground truth

Countries

Canada, Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactJussi Nikkola, MD, PhD
jussi.nikkola@fimnet.fi03311611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026