Skip to content

What Are the Effects of Lower Limb Dysmetria on Gluteus Medius and Erector Spinae Musculature?

Changes in Activity of Erector Spinae and Gluteus Medius Muscles With the Presence of Simulated Lower Limb Dysmetria

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06217835
Acronym
s-EMG
Enrollment
34
Registered
2024-01-23
Start date
2023-03-20
Completion date
2023-09-08
Last updated
2024-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscular Disorders, Atrophic

Keywords

Low Back Pain, electromyography, Leg Length Inequality, lower limb length

Brief summary

Gluteus Medius (GM) has also been implicated in the development of Low Back Pain (LBP). GM is one of the main pelvic, where he actively participates in control of motion in the frontal and transverse plane, and hip , improving stability to the lumbopelvic-hip complex. The aim of present study was to investigate whether modifying lower limb length with a different foot insoles of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 cm in a normal population has an effect on ES and GM activity and as a consequence in LBP. As a secondary objective, in turn, to evaluate whether ES and GM activity has an effect on jumping ability as assessed through CMJ.

Detailed description

Background: Length leg discrepancy (LLD), regardless of its origin, is a very common pathology that can contribute to low back pain. Various authors point out its relationship with the lack of activation of both the gluteus medius (GM) and the ipsilateral erector spinae (ES). The purpose of this study was to identify the activation of Es and GM with different simulated LLD, correlating said activation with the LBP. In turn, to evaluate whether ES and GM activity has an effect on jumping ability as assessed through CMJ. (2) Method: a sample of healthy subjects was selected to whom an artificial LLD was incorporated through a 0.5, 1 and 1.5 cm insole, measuring with EMGs in these 3 moments while walking and performing a counter movement jump (CMJ). The measurement was carried out in random order, in terms of insole height, using a Latin Square. Muscle activation patterns were recorded for 30 seconds at each of the insole heights while walking at 5.7 km/h and compared with the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), both on the ipsilateral and contra-lateral sides. These muscles were then measured under the same circumstances during the development of the CMJ. (3)

Interventions

OTHERTo evaluate the response of an orthopedic insole

To evaluate the response of an orthopedic insole of different heights on gait.

OTHERevaluate activation of musculature

To evaluate the response caused by an orthopedic insole of different heights on the indicated musculature.

Sponsors

Camilo Jose Cela University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\-

Exclusion criteria

* The volunteers had no problems in range of motion of joints of the lower limbs * pelvic obliquity due to a functional leg length discrepancy. * obesity with body mass index (BMI) 35 \> kg/m²

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Height CMJ1 weekCMJ jump flight height
Height DJ LEFT1 weekFlying height in drop jump left leg
Height DJ RIGHT1 weekFlying height in drop jump right leg
Gluteus medius (mv)1 weekGluteus medius activation (mv)
Erector Spinae (mv)1 weekErector Spinae activation (mv)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026