Skip to content

Inflammatory Markers in Saliva of Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome

Inflammatory Markers in Saliva of Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome Before and After Treatment With Low-Level Laser Therapy and Clonazepam: A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06217731
Acronym
burningmouth
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-01-22
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2023-12-10
Last updated
2024-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burning Mouth Syndrome

Keywords

saliva, pain, markers

Brief summary

Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain disorder that presents with inflammation and burning sensation in the oral cavity without visible lesions. Multiple therapies have been investigated without conclusive results.Objective: To analyse the efficacy of treatment with Clonazepam (Rivotril) and Low Power Diode Laser Therapy in patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome and to study the markers of inflammation present in the patients' saliva. Methods: Randomised, single-blind clinical trial with 89 patients divided into Group 1 Laser + Rivotril (n=20), Group 2 Laser Sham placebo (n=19), Group 3 Laser (n=21) and Group 4 Rivotril (n=18). The intensity of symptomatology was rated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Sialometry was performed before and after treatment and questionnaires such as the Xerostomia Inventory, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP14) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) were completed. Saliva samples were analysed by measuring markers related to inflammatory processes; Interleukins (IL2, IL4, IL 5, IL6, IL 7, IL 8, IL1β, IL 10, IL12, IL13, IL17, IL21, IL23), proteins (MIP-3α, MIP-1α, MIP-1β), Cytokine GM-CSF, Interferon gamma (IFNγ), Interferon Inducible Tα-Cell Chemoattractant (ITAC), Fractalkine and Tumour Necrosis Factor α(TNFα).

Detailed description

Methods: Randomised, single-blind clinical trial with 89 patients divided into Group 1 Laser + Rivotril (n=20), Group 2 Laser Sham placebo (n=19), Group 3 Laser (n=21) and Group 4 Rivotril (n=18). The intensity of symptomatology was rated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Sialometry was performed before and after treatment and questionnaires such as the Xerostomia Inventory, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP14) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) were completed. Saliva samples were analysed by measuring markers related to inflammatory processes; Interleukins (IL2, IL4, IL 5, IL6, IL 7, IL 8, IL1β, IL 10, IL12, IL13, IL17, IL21, IL23), proteins (MIP-3α, MIP-1α, MIP-1β), Cytokine GM-CSF, Interferon gamma (IFNγ), Interferon Inducible Tα-Cell Chemoattractant (ITAC), Fractalkine and Tumour Necrosis Factor α(TNFα).

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTLaser+clonazepam

treated with the Helbo® Theralite Laser 3D Pocket Probe low power diode laser once a week for a month and Rivotril 0.25mg once every 24 hours for a month

INACTIVE Helbo® Theralite Laser 3D Pocket Probe low power diode laser once a week for a month

DEVICELaser

Active Helbo® Theralite Laser 3D Pocket Probe low power diode laser once a week for a month

DRUGClonazepam

Rivotril 0.25mg once every 24 hours for a month

Sponsors

Universidad de Murcia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients who were included in Group 1 (n=20) were treated with the low power diode laser Helbo® Theralite Laser 3D Pocket Probe once a week for one month and Rivotril 0.25mg once every 24 hours for one month. Group 2 (n=19) were treated with the same laser once a week for one month, but with the tip not activated as a placebo treatment. Group 3 (n=21) were only treated with Helbo® laser once a week for one month and Group 4 (n=18) had only Rivotril 0.25mg once a day for one month. The patients were not aware of the different groups on which this study is based.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) burning sensation in the oral mucosa or recurrent dysesthetics daily for more than 2 hours a day for more than 3 months, without clinically evident causal lesions

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating patients * Oncology patients * Sjögren's syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain EVABaseline through 1 monthThe intensity of the symptoms was rated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0=no pain and 10=maximum possible pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
salivary biomarkersBaseline through 1 monthsalivary biomarkers interleukins (IL2, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL7, IL8, IL1β)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026