Skip to content

Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Right Colon Polyp Detection

Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Right Colon Polyp Detection: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06216405
Acronym
AIRCOP
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2024-01-22
Start date
2022-01-20
Completion date
2024-01-03
Last updated
2024-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colon Cancer, Colon Lesion, Colon Polyp

Keywords

Colonoscopy, Polyp detection, Artificial Intelligence

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess whether the use of artificial intelligence improves polyp detection in a segment of the colon (the right colon). To achieve this objective, patients will be divided into two groups: one will undergo a standard colonoscopy, the other a colonoscopy with the artificial intelligence software connected to the machine. This software does not modify the colonoscopy technique in any way, and does not require the administration of any product to the patient. The study will compare the detection rate of right colon polyps between the group of patients who underwent standard colonoscopy and those who underwent colonoscopy with artificial intelligence. If this number does not differ between the two groups, the investigators can conclude that there is no point in using artificial intelligence.

Detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and remains one of the leading causes of mortality among neoplastic diseases in the world. Screening colonoscopy with detection and resection of colorectal polyps have reduced CRC incidence and mortality. Nevertheless, colonoscopy is an imperfect screening test and its effectiveness is influenced by a range of variables including the skill and expertise of the endoscopist. Indeed, a significant proportion of colorectal neoplasia is missed during colonoscopic examinations. In the majority of studies, the rate of interval CRC among all CRCs ranged from 2% to 9% and interval cancers occurred more likely in the right colon. Interval cancers can result from missed lesion, incomplete removal or newly developed cancer. Most missed polyps are smaller than 10 mm in diameter and are sessile or flat in appearance. Therefore, sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), which predominantly occur in the right colon, are easily missed because they are small and sessile. Colonoscopy is less effective in screening right sided CRCs, mainly because of the increased miss rate for polyps with sessile or flat appearance. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially in the detection of colorectal polyps. In 2019, the first prospective randomized controlled trial including 1058 patients and comparing the polyp detection rate in colonoscopy with or without AI showed a significantly higher detection rate in the group with AI (29.1% vs 20.3%). Other previous prospective studies have showed that AI had great potential for improving colonic polyp detection. To our knowledge, this is the first study to date to evaluate the performance of the AI in the detection of right colon polyps. In this study, the investigators aim first of all to compare the rate of right colon polyp detection with AI-aided colonoscopy (AIC) to the rate obtained by the Standard (high-definition) colonoscopy (SC) in patient undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Then, the investigators would to evaluate the following endpoints: 1. Comparison of time required for AIC versus SC (withdrawal time) 2. Comparison of histological classification of all polyps detected in each group 3. Comparison of the number of right colon polyps detected in each group 4. A subgroup analysis comparing the rate of colon polyp detection between the two groups will be realized according to the procedure starting time (accounting for operator fatigability).

Interventions

PROCEDUREColonoscopy

Colonoscopy

Sponsors

Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

A single-blind, randomised study. Patient is not informed of the arm he is assigned to.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized into the two groups: * Experimental : AI-aided colonoscopy using GI Genius™ intelligent endoscopy system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) * Control : Standard high-definition colonoscopy: Randomization will be established according to a 1:1 ratio, balanced and per block of variable size, and stratified according to age (≤50 vs \>50 years-old) and on personal polyps or colorectal cancer history (yes vs no)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>18 years * Signed informed consent * Affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with history of inflammatory bowel diseases * Patients with history of familial polyposis syndrome * Patients with history of right colonic resection. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patient benefiting from a legal protection measure : tutorship, curatorship, patient deprived of freedom * Adults who are unable to give their consent * People under psychiatric care who are not able to understand the aim if this research

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the percentage of patients with at least one right colon polyp detected according to the randomization group, and adjusted for Boston Bowel preparation scale, for the operator, for the endoscope and for stratification factors.Inclusion visitA multiple logistic regression comparing the percentage of patients with at least one right colon polyp detected according to the randomization group, and adjusted for Boston Bowel preparation scale (6-7 vs \>7), for the operator, for the endoscope (Pentax or Fuji) and for stratification factors (age and polyps or CRC history).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026