Skip to content

Evaluate the Effectiveness and the Safety of a Medical Device in the Treatment of Common Warts and Plantar Warts.

Prospective Multicentric, Before After Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and the Safety of a Medical Device in the Treatment of Common Warts and Plantar Warts.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06214559
Enrollment
33
Registered
2024-01-19
Start date
2024-02-19
Completion date
2024-08-20
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Common Wart, Plantar Wart, Warts

Brief summary

The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the tested product on common and plantar wart after 35 days of treatment. For this study, 33 patients presenting at least one common wart on the fingers, back on the hand or a plantar wart of a size between 0.1 and 0.5cm and present since less than 6 months will be included to reach this objective

Detailed description

Warts are the cutaneous manifestations of human papillomavirus (HPV). (1) Cutaneous warts are benign, spontaneously regressing, epithelial tumors differing in clinical morphology depending on the human papilloma virus HPV-types. (2) Warts may exist in different forms given the epithelial surface and HPV type responsible for the infection. Common warts (Verruca vulgaris), plantar warts (Verruca plantaris), flat or planar warts (Verruca plana), and genital warts (Condyloma acuminata) are some of the clinical manifestations of HPV infection. (1) Warts are most common on your hands, feet, and face. (3) Warts are common worldwide and affect approximately 10% of the population. In school-aged children, the prevalence is as high as 10% to 20% (4). The range of greatest incidence is between 12 and 16 years of age. (1) It is known that nearly two-thirds of warts spontaneously disappear within 24 months. (4) The majority of warts do not cause symptoms. However, they do cause cosmetic disfigurement and, in a rare patient, may cause localized pain. Plantar warts can be painful because of compression and extensive friction that can lead to bleeding. (4) Once the diagnosis is made, the treatment depends on symptoms, patient preferences, and cost. Even though there are many treatments for warts, none is very effective, and recurrences are common with each of them. (4) This is why, developing a product that is effective against warts seems necessary. PODERM Professional has developed an innovative wart-treatment formula based on biomimetics. The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the tested product on common and plantar wart after 35 days of treatment. For this study, 33 patients presenting at least one common wart on the fingers, back on the hand or a plantar wart of a size between 0.1 and 0.5cm and present since less than 6 months will be included to reach this objective.

Interventions

DEVICESérum VERRUPRO

To be applied twice a day

Sponsors

Swiss Footcare Laboratories - Poderm Professional
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patient having given freely her/his informed, written consent. Patient having a good general health. Age: more than 18 years. Patient cooperative and aware of the device's modalities of use and the necessity and duration of the controls so that perfect adhesion to the protocol can be expected. Patient being psychologically able to understand information and to give his/her consent. Patient presenting at least 1 common wart, present since less than 6 months, on the fingers, back of the hands (60% of patients) and/or at least 1 plantar wart (40% of patients). Patient presenting wart of a size between 0,1 and 0,5 cm. Women of childbearing potential should use an accepted contraceptive regimen (at the Investigator's discretion) since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study and during all the study.

Exclusion criteria

For plantar wart: wart on the point of support. Wart with keratosis. Wart in mosaic. Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the investigation. Patient considered by the investigator likely to be non-compliant with the protocol. Patient enrolled in another clinical trial during the test period. Patient having a known allergy or hypersensitivity to one of the constituents of the tested products. Patient with a condition or receiving a medication which, in the investigator's judgment, put the patient at undue risk. Patient suffering from serious or progressive diseases (to investigator's discretion) such as uncontrolled diabetes, peripheral circulatory disease, immunocompromised patient HIV, psoriasis, lichen planus, immunosuppressive pathology, chronic venous insufficiency, Peripheral Arterial Obstructive Disease, delay or lack of ungual growth … Patient with cutaneous pathology on studied zone other than warts.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diameter of the WartDay 0, Day 35Clinical examination performed by the investigator to evaluate the diameter of the wart at D0 and 35 days after treatment. The effect of the product on clinical parameters will be evaluated by comparing the mean diameter before and after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Roughness of the WartDay 0, Day 35The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment. This outcome was measured using a scale from 0 (No roughness) to 5 (very severe roughness).
Thickness of the WartDay 0, Day 35The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment. This outcome was measured using a scale form 0 (no tickness) to 4(Very severe)
Number of Dermal PapillaeDay 0, Day 35The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment.
Global Improvement of the WartDay 35The global improvement of the wart will be assessed by the investigator after 35 days of treatment.
Patient EvaluationDay 35Analysis of the answers to the patient questionnaire regarding effectiveness, tolerance, and acceptability of the investigational device 35 days after treatment.
Adverse EventDay 0, Day 35Products safety will be assessed by collection of Adverse Events (AEs) throughout the study. AEs will be summarized and tabulated by severity, causality, action taken and outcome, using descriptive statistics.
Product ToleranceDay 0, Day 35Product tolerance will be assessed by the investigator at D0 (before the product use) and D35 by a clinical examination.
Number of Participants Who Participated in Photography SessionDay 0, Day 35Illustration of the effectiveness of Sérum VERRUPRO® on the skin aspect before and after the treatment with photographs. A standardized photographs was taken at D0 an D35 in order to illustrate the effect of the product. No data were measured on these pictures. Number of Participants Who Participated in Photography Session

Countries

Tunisia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment in two private prictise in Tunisia from 19.02.2024 to 16.07.2024

Pre-assignment details

Not applicable. No enrolled patient were excluded from the study before groups assignments

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Serum VERRUPRO
To be applied twice a day Sérum VERRUPRO: To be applied twice a day
33
Total33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSerum VERRUPRO
Age, Continuous36.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.12
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Tunisia
33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Diameter of the Wart

Clinical examination performed by the investigator to evaluate the diameter of the wart at D0 and 35 days after treatment. The effect of the product on clinical parameters will be evaluated by comparing the mean diameter before and after treatment.

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: On ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Serum VERRUPRODiameter of the Wart-0.12 cmStandard Error 0.14
Secondary

Adverse Event

Products safety will be assessed by collection of Adverse Events (AEs) throughout the study. AEs will be summarized and tabulated by severity, causality, action taken and outcome, using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: No adverse event during the study

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Serum VERRUPROAdverse Event0 Participants
Secondary

Global Improvement of the Wart

The global improvement of the wart will be assessed by the investigator after 35 days of treatment.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: On per protocol population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Serum VERRUPROGlobal Improvement of the WartBeginning of improvement15 Participants
Serum VERRUPROGlobal Improvement of the WartSignificant improvement12 Participants
Serum VERRUPROGlobal Improvement of the WartTotal recovery4 Participants
Serum VERRUPROGlobal Improvement of the WartNo change1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Dermal Papillae

The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment.

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: On per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Serum VERRUPRONumber of Dermal Papillae-4.1 number of dermal papillaeStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Participated in Photography Session

Illustration of the effectiveness of Sérum VERRUPRO® on the skin aspect before and after the treatment with photographs. A standardized photographs was taken at D0 an D35 in order to illustrate the effect of the product. No data were measured on these pictures. Number of Participants Who Participated in Photography Session

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: Only photographs for illustration, no data analysed. Number of Participants Who Participated in Photography Session

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Serum VERRUPRONumber of Participants Who Participated in Photography Session32 Participants
Secondary

Patient Evaluation

Analysis of the answers to the patient questionnaire regarding effectiveness, tolerance, and acceptability of the investigational device 35 days after treatment.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: On per protocol population, are you globally statisfied with the product

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Serum VERRUPROPatient Evaluationtotally agree8 Participants
Serum VERRUPROPatient Evaluationagree9 Participants
Serum VERRUPROPatient Evaluationneutral11 Participants
Serum VERRUPROPatient Evaluationdisagree4 Participants
Serum VERRUPROPatient Evaluationtotally disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Product Tolerance

Product tolerance will be assessed by the investigator at D0 (before the product use) and D35 by a clinical examination.

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: on per protocol population, evaluation of local tolerance on redness / edema / Desquamation and dryness. here is presented redness at D35

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Serum VERRUPROProduct ToleranceNone18 Participants
Serum VERRUPROProduct ToleranceVery mild9 Participants
Serum VERRUPROProduct ToleranceMild3 Participants
Serum VERRUPROProduct ToleranceModerate1 Participants
Serum VERRUPROProduct ToleranceSevere1 Participants
Secondary

Roughness of the Wart

The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment. This outcome was measured using a scale from 0 (No roughness) to 5 (very severe roughness).

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: On per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Serum VERRUPRORoughness of the Wart-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Thickness of the Wart

The effect of the product on these clinical parameters will be evaluated by a comparison before and after treatment. This outcome was measured using a scale form 0 (no tickness) to 4(Very severe)

Time frame: Day 0, Day 35

Population: On per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Serum VERRUPROThickness of the Wart-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026