Skip to content

The Efficacy Tretinoin Cream in the Treatment of Axillary Hyperpigmentation Associated With Acanthosis Nigricans

A Control Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of 0.025% Tretinoin Cream and Cream Based in the Treatment of Axillary Hyperpigmentation Associated With Acanthosis Nigricans

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06213987
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-01-19
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2024-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acanthosis Nigricans, Hyperpigmentation

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized intra-individual design with a split-side axillary approach is to comparing the efficacy of 0.025% tretinoin cream against a cream-based formulation in the treatment of axillary hyperpigmentation associated with acanthosis nigricans. The main questions it aims to answer are: * The efficacy of 0.025% tretinoin cream and cream based in the treatment of axillary hyperpigmentation associated with acanthosis nigricans. * The safety of 0.025% tretinoin cream and cream based in the treatment of axillary hyperpigmentation associated with acanthosis nigricans. Participants were randomly assigned to apply both 0.025% tretinoin cream and the cream-based product on opposing sides of the axillary region.

Detailed description

This study employed a randomized intra-individual design with a split-side axillary approach, comparing the efficacy of 0.025% tretinoin cream against a cream-based formulation. Participants were randomly assigned to apply both 0.025% tretinoin cream and the cream-based product on opposing sides of the axillary region. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by Mexameter (melanin index). The investigator's global evaluation (IGE) and parent's global evaluation (PGE) were also used to evaluate the overall success rate. The local safety was conducted for assessment of any cutaneous irritation. At each visit, the investigator graded the degrees of erythema, dryness, peeling, burning, and itching using a scale of 0 to 4. This study was followed for 4 visits, at the baseline, at week 2, 4 and 8.

Interventions

DRUG0.025% Tretinoin

Total duration of 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Srinakharinwirot University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

They were allocated the treatment via simple randomization by a third investigator who was not involved in data collection and analysis. Participants were given unlabeled jars of the topical agents. Assessments regarding clinical efficacy will be conducted by an assessor blind to treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

Intra-individual design with a split-side axillary approach, participants were randomly assigned to apply both 0.025% tretinoin cream and the cream-based product on opposing sides of the axillary region.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participants aged over 18 years with BMI more than 25 kg/m2, axillary hyperpigmentation associated with acanthosis nigricans

Exclusion criteria

* Vulnerable skin diseases * Infectious skin diseases * Other recent diseases involving the axillary * Other serious medical disorders e.g. liver disease * Any patients having received other therapies for up to 4 weeks prior to enrollment * Photosensitive skin * Immunocompromised host * Pregnancy and lactation * Receiving oral retinoids * Axillary tattoo

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Melanin index assessed by Mexameterweeks 0, 2, 4 and week 8The outcome was treatment efficacy in reducing skin pigmentation, as represented by changes in melanin indices from Mexameter MX18.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global evaluation scalesweeks 0, 2, 4 and week 8The outcomes were improvement in overall assessment using investigator global evaluation scales (IGE) and patient global evaluation scales (PGE), with scores ranging from 0 to 6 (0= clear, 1= almost clear or \>90% improvement; 2= marked improvement or \>75% improvement; 3= moderate improvement or \>50% improvement; 4= mild improvement or \>25% improvement; 5= no change; 6= worsening).
Adverse cutaneous reactionsweeks 0, 2, 4 and week 8Adverse reactions were explored using the cutaneous irritation grading scales, in which participants rated erythema, dryness, peeling, burning each on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 representing no adverse effect and 4 as marked severity.

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026