Skip to content

The Effects of Executive Functions and Social Cognition on Mental Health

Investigating The Effects of Executive Functions and Social Cognition on the Relationship Between Autistic Traits and Mental Health

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06213194
Enrollment
178
Registered
2024-01-19
Start date
2024-05-20
Completion date
2024-10-21
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism or Autistic Traits, Executive Dysfunction, Mental Health Disorder, Social Cognition

Keywords

Autism, Executive Functions, Online Training, Social Cognition, Mental Health

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of executive functions (EFs) and social-cognitive abilities on the associations between autistic traits and mental health indicators (depression, anxiety, and stress). Moreover, the study will produce online training modules for executive functions and social cognition, aimed at reducing the likelihood of adverse mental health outcomes in individuals with and without elevated autistic traits. Therefore, four main hypotheses will be addressed: 1. Revealing the mediating role of executive functions (cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and working memory) will help predict the association between autistic traits and mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, and stress). 2. Revealing the mediating role of social cognitive skills (cognitive empathy and affective empathy) will help predict the association between autistic traits and mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, and stress). 3. Online training in executive functions and social cognitive skills will help develop executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) and social cognitive skills (cognitive empathy and affective empathy) in the current sample. 4. Online training in executive functions and social cognitive skills will promote mental health by reducing distress, depression, and anxiety symptoms in the current sample. Participants will be between the ages of 18-35 because previous findings indicate that the age of onset of various mental health problems is between the ages of 17 and 35. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Using a longitudinal design including pre-test, post-test, and follow-up conditions to test the effectiveness of combined EFs and social cognition online training for mental health symptoms.

Detailed description

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a neurodevelopmental condition that is associated with impairments in social and cognitive functions, repetitive behaviors, and restricted interests, while autistic traits refer to a subclinical level of ASD and its symptoms distributed in the general population. Previous studies have identified people with elevated autistic traits who show susceptibility to other mental health conditions such as anxiety disorders, mood disorders, borderline personality disorder, internet addiction, conduct disorder, substance abuse, and suicidal risk in the general population. Although there is no identifiable explanation of susceptibility to other mental health conditions, the presence of social and cognitive impairments including problems in executive functions and social cognitive skills might be contributing factors. Previous research indicated that social cognitive skills such as cognitive and affective empathy and executive functions including working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility play important roles in physical and mental health, quality of life, social competence, school and job success, marital harmony, and public safety. Nevertheless, although autistic traits increase susceptibility to other mental health conditions, no study so far has focused on examining the relationships among autistic traits, executive functions, and social cognitive skills to design intervention and prevention programs for mental health conditions and quality of life in both general and clinical populations. The primary purpose of the research is to investigate the effects of executive functions and social cognitive skills on the relationship between autistic traits and mental health symptoms that would be significant for designing intervention and prevention programs. The second purpose of the research is to design online executive functions and social cognitive training that might help to reduce vulnerability to negative effects on mental health symptoms in the general population regarding elevated autistic traits. Using a longitudinal design including pre-test, post-test, and follow-up conditions to test the effectiveness of combined executive functions (EFs) and social cognition online training via computers, tablets, or smartphones for mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, and stress). This study's independent variables are executive functions (cognitive flexibility, inhibition, and working memory) and social cognition (cognitive empathy and affective empathy). Dependent variables are mental health scores (depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms). Participants will be between the ages of 18 and 35 because previous findings indicate that the age of onset of various mental health problems is between the ages of 17 and 35. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Online-based training will consist of combined executive functions and social cognitive (i.e., cognitive empathy and affective empathy) tasks. The length of the training each week will be 75 minutes based on the previous studies. Three within conditions will be present: pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. The primary outcomes of the study are mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, stress), EFs (working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition), and social cognition (cognitive and affective empathy).

Interventions

OTHERMindZone

The name of the online training will be MindZone. It consists of combined game-based social cognitive and executive functions skills, and it will be presented on the training website. There is no consensus about the length of time for the training in the literature, so the average time for the training process will be used. This means that the training will last 6 weeks, 7.5 hours in total. To satisfy the training requirement, 1.15 hours (75 mins) of play will be expected from participants each week. Before each game, a brief introduction about the game will be presented and participants will get feedback about their progress. Each participant will conduct the tasks in a different random order. After 6 weeks, a post-test will be completed, and follow-up scores will be obtained after a month. All tasks were designed according to the five intervention areas: working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, cognitive empathy and affective empathy based on the literature.

Sponsors

Ibn Haldun University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

To reduce biases, a single-blind procedure will be applied. It will be provided basic information about topics including social-cognitive skills and mental health but no detailed description of training will be given.

Intervention model description

All participants would be assigned randomly to the experimental group and control group (wait-list condition) to see whether the combined training program is effective for the general population.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. aged 18 or above 2. Fluent in writing and speaking in Turkish 3. No record of any psychiatric disorders 4. No record of neurological conditions

Exclusion criteria

1. under age 18 2. Have any record of psychiatric 3. Have any neurological conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inhibition - Errors RatePre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Inhibition - Errors Rate will be measured by Go/No Go task. Higher scores indicate lower inhibition. There are 12 blocks of 50 trials each. Commission errors (i.e., incorrectly responding to no-go trials) were measured. Maximum score is 600. Minimum score is 0.
Cognitive Flexibility - Errors RatePre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Cognitive flexibility - Errors Rate will be measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Higher errors indicate lower scores on cognitive flexibility. During the task, 400 cards in two blocks are displayed on the screen and the sorting rule changes after every 10 cards. Maximum score is 400 and minimum score is 0.
Working Memory - Errors RatePre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Working memory - Errors Rate will be measured by the N-back task. Higher errors indicate lower working memory scores. Maximum score is 400, minimum score is 0
Depression_1Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 will be used to measure depression outcome. Higher scores mean higher depressive symptoms. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.
AnxietyPre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 will be used to measure anxiety outcome. Higher scores mean higher anxiety symptoms. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.
StressPre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 will be used to measure stress outcome. Higher scores indicate higher stress. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Assessment Manikin for Affective Empathypretest and posttest conditionsSelf Assessment Manikin was used to measure affective empathy. Valence scores for each emotion were obtained by summing responses for all images. The maximum score is 270, and the minimum score is 30. Higher scores indicate better affective empathy.
Cognitive Empathypretest and posttest conditionsThe Eyes Test were used to measure cognitive empathy. Higher scores indicate higher cognitive empathy scores. Maximum score is 36, minimum score is 0.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Online data collection were used.

Pre-assignment details

Participants are under the age of 18, and who have any record of psychiatric or physical conditions excluded from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group
It combines social cognitive and executive functions skills and it will be present on the designed website and they will participate in the intervention online. After participants are assigned the experimental group the 6-week training program will start and they cannot access the next week before completing the previous week. Each week's will last about 75 minutes. The training includes social cognitive skills including cognitive and affective empathy and executive functions. MindZone: The name of the online training will be MindZone. It consists of combined game-based social cognitive and executive functions skills, and it will be presented on the training website. There is no consensus about the length of time for the training in the literature, so the average time for the training process will be used. This means that the training will last 6 weeks, 7.5 hours in total. To satisfy the training requirement, 1.15 hours (75 mins) of play will be expected from participants each week. Before each game, a brief introduction about the game will be presented and participants will get feedback about their progress. Each participant will conduct the tasks in a different random order. After 6 weeks, a post-test will be completed, and follow-up scores will be obtained after a month. All tasks were designed according to the five intervention areas: working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, cognitive empathy and affective empathy based on the literature.
89
Control Group
This group will not take the training until the follow-up test. After the study will be done, the training program will be offered to the control group as well.
89
Total178

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalExperimental Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
89 Participants178 Participants89 Participants
Age, Continuous27.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.13
27.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.02
27.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.95
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
89 Participants178 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants57 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Anxiety

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 will be used to measure anxiety outcome. Higher scores mean higher anxiety symptoms. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: experimental and control groups

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupAnxietyPretest9.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Experimental GroupAnxietyPosttest6.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Control GroupAnxietyPretest9.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
Control GroupAnxietyPosttest8.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Primary

Cognitive Flexibility - Errors Rate

Cognitive flexibility - Errors Rate will be measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Higher errors indicate lower scores on cognitive flexibility. During the task, 400 cards in two blocks are displayed on the screen and the sorting rule changes after every 10 cards. Maximum score is 400 and minimum score is 0.

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: experimental group vs. control group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupCognitive Flexibility - Errors RatePretest21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Experimental GroupCognitive Flexibility - Errors RatePosttest40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Control GroupCognitive Flexibility - Errors RatePretest22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Control GroupCognitive Flexibility - Errors RatePosttest37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Primary

Depression_1

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 will be used to measure depression outcome. Higher scores mean higher depressive symptoms. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: Experimental and control groups

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupDepression_1Pretest9.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.72
Experimental GroupDepression_1Posttest7.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Control GroupDepression_1Pretest10.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.02
Control GroupDepression_1Posttest9.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.13
Primary

Inhibition - Errors Rate

Inhibition - Errors Rate will be measured by Go/No Go task. Higher scores indicate lower inhibition. There are 12 blocks of 50 trials each. Commission errors (i.e., incorrectly responding to no-go trials) were measured. Maximum score is 600. Minimum score is 0.

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: experimental group vs. control group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupInhibition - Errors RatePretest5.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.59
Experimental GroupInhibition - Errors RatePosttest4.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
Control GroupInhibition - Errors RatePretest3.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.18
Control GroupInhibition - Errors RatePosttest3.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Primary

Stress

Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 will be used to measure stress outcome. Higher scores indicate higher stress. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21, respectively.

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: experimental group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupStressPretest7.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Experimental GroupStressPosttest5.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
Control GroupStressPretest6.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Control GroupStressPosttest7.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.05
Primary

Working Memory - Errors Rate

Working memory - Errors Rate will be measured by the N-back task. Higher errors indicate lower working memory scores. Maximum score is 400, minimum score is 0

Time frame: Pre-test (baseline), Post-test (immediately after the intervention)

Population: experimental group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupWorking Memory - Errors RatePretest20.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.19
Experimental GroupWorking Memory - Errors RatePosttest13.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.59
Control GroupWorking Memory - Errors RatePretest15.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.94
Control GroupWorking Memory - Errors RatePosttest10.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.55
Secondary

Cognitive Empathy

The Eyes Test were used to measure cognitive empathy. Higher scores indicate higher cognitive empathy scores. Maximum score is 36, minimum score is 0.

Time frame: pretest and posttest conditions

Population: experimental and control groups

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupCognitive EmpathyPretest24.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.88
Experimental GroupCognitive EmpathyPosttest25.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
Control GroupCognitive EmpathyPretest25.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Control GroupCognitive EmpathyPosttest26.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.44
Secondary

Self-Assessment Manikin for Affective Empathy

Self Assessment Manikin was used to measure affective empathy. Valence scores for each emotion were obtained by summing responses for all images. The maximum score is 270, and the minimum score is 30. Higher scores indicate better affective empathy.

Time frame: pretest and posttest conditions

Population: experimental and control groups

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupSelf-Assessment Manikin for Affective EmpathyPretest130.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Experimental GroupSelf-Assessment Manikin for Affective EmpathyPosttest126.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Control GroupSelf-Assessment Manikin for Affective EmpathyPretest119.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.88
Control GroupSelf-Assessment Manikin for Affective EmpathyPosttest117.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.61

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026