Skip to content

Impact on Mortality of a Strategy Including Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Plus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Alone in Patients With de Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Impact on Mortality of a Strategy Including Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Plus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Alone in Patients With de Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06213168
Acronym
HighCPAP
Enrollment
1084
Registered
2024-01-19
Start date
2025-08-19
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

De Novo Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure (hARF)

Keywords

Continuous positive airway pressure, High flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, De novo hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, Intensive care unit, Mortality, Mechanical ventilation, Non-invasive ventilation

Brief summary

De novo hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) is one of the main causes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. In de novo hARF, intubation is associated with a dramatic increase in mortality rate. Compared to standard oxygen, the use of high-flow oxygen nasal cannula (HFNC) might be beneficial to prevent intubation and mortality, although the results of trials and meta-analyses are conflicting. Even with HFNC, the intubation rate remains high. This is the reason why adjunctive therapies, administered in addition to HFNC are needed. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is one of these adjunctive therapies. CPAP provides high level of positive end-expiratory pressure that ensures lung recruitment, but without adding inspiratory pressure support, which prevents ventilator induced lung injury. In addition, as opposed to pressure support, CPAP is well tolerated during long periods of time. Therefore, applying CPAP in addition to HFNC may reduce intubation rate and in turn mortality rate. The present trial will evaluate the impact on mortality of a strategy including continuous positive airway pressure plus high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy alone in patients with de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions

OTHERHFNC

Patients assigned to the control group will be continuously treated by HFNC. HFNC will be initiated within one hour following randomization

OTHERCPAP and HFNC

Patients assigned to the intervention group will receive high flow nasal oxygen plus CPAP sessions

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective multicentre open-label randomized controlled superiority trial with two parallel arms comparing two oxygenation strategies, HFNC plus CPAP versus HFNC alone, in patients admitted in ICU for de novo hARF.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults (≥ 18 years old) 2. Admitted in the ICU for ≤ 24 hours 3. De novo hARF defined by the three following criteria: 1. Respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/min or signs of respiratory distress such as labored breathing or paradoxical inspiration 2. PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg under HFNC with flow ≥ 45 L/min, actual FiO2 being considered. 3. Uni or bilateral pulmonary infiltrate on chest X-ray or CT scan 4. Informed consent from the patient or her/his next of kin or another substitute decision maker, or inclusion procedure in emergency if the patient is unable to consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Refusal of study participation by the patient or the proxy 2. Anatomical factors precluding the use of a nasal cannula or CPAP 3. Long term oxygen 4. Home CPAP or NIV or CPAP or NIV initiated prior to ICU admission 5. Hypercapnia indicating NIV (PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg) 6. Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary oedema indicating NIV 7. Known pregnancy or breastfeeding 8. Absence of coverage by the French statutory health care insurance system (including AME) 9. Abdominal, thoracic or cardiac surgery within the last 6 days 10. Use of vasopressors (norepinephrine\>0.3 mcg/kg/min) 11. Glasgow coma scale \< 13 12. Urgent need for endotracheal intubation 13. Patients at an end-of-life stage receiving compational oxygenation 14. Exacerbation of a chronic respiratory disease 15. Legal protection (curatorship or tutorship) 16. Undrained pneumothorax

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality90 daysTime to death within the 90 days after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time from randomization to intubation.28 days
Intensity of dyspnea until intubation as assessed by a visual analogic scale from zero (no dyspnea) to 100 (maximum possible dyspnea).2, 6, 12 and 24 hours
Respiratory rate6, 12 and 24 hours
ROX index6, 12 and 24 hours
Evaluation of intolerance to oxygenation technique until intubation12 and 24 hoursevaluation based on the following physical criteria: eyes dryness, nose dryness and/or feeling of gastric distention
Discomfort associated with the interface as assessed by a visual analogic scale from zero (no discomfort) to 100 (maximum possible discomfort).12 and 24 hours
Level of oxygenation assessed by blood gas that will be sampled on the request of the physician in charge (clinical purpose only).First 24 hours or until intubation
Use of NIV for one of the following predefined indication criteria.through study completion1. the constitution of a clear indication such as acute-on-chronic respiratory failure with respiratory acidosis (pH \< 7.35) or acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, 2. pre oxygenation before intubation, 3. fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Death within the ICUthrough patient participation period,180 days maximum
Time to deaththrough patient participation period, an average of 180 days maximum
Death within the hospital and time to death.through patient participation period,180 days maximum
Number of invasive ventilation-free days at 28 days defined as days alive and without intubation.Between day 1 and day 28One point will be given for each day during the measurement period, i.e. from the first day of randomization to day 28 that patients will be both alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation. Zero value will be given for patients who die before day 28.
Number of HFNC-free days at 28 days defined as days non-intubated, alive and without HFNC.Between day 1 and day 28.One point will be given for each day during the measurement period, i.e. from the first day of randomization to day 28 that patients will be both alive and free of HFNO and invasive mechanical ventilation. Zero value will be given for patients who die or are intubated before day 28.
ICU length of stay.through patient participation period,180 days maximum
Hospital length of stay.through patient participation period,180 days maximum
Occurrence of any adverse event during the ICU stay, with a particular focus on hospital or ventilator associated pneumonia, non-respiratory infections, cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest.through patient participation period,180 days maximum

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTAlexandre DEMOULE
alexandre.demoule@aphp.fr+33 (0)1 42 16 77 61

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026