Skip to content

Assessment of Periodontal Therapy and Biofilm Management in Breast Cancer

Integrating Periodontal Therapy and Biofilm Management Into Breast Cancer Patients' Care: Periodontal, Hematological and Salivary Parameters Assessment Before and During Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06212908
Acronym
BREASTCANCER
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-01-19
Start date
2012-09-18
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Gingivitis, Periodontal

Keywords

Breast cancer, Gingivitis, Periodontal therapy

Brief summary

Objective: To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on periodontal conditions, hematology, and salivary flow in patients with breast cancer and gingivitis, after basic periodontal therapy (BPT). Methods: They were divided into patients with breast cancer and gingivitis (BC/G =20); and patients without cancer with gingivitis (G=20). Clinical parameters \[Plaque Index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), Probing Depth (PS), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)\], hematological parameters (complete blood count), and salivary flow were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

Detailed description

Objective: To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on periodontal conditions, hematology, and salivary flow in patients with breast cancer and gingivitis, after basic periodontal therapy (BPT). Methods: They were divided into patients with breast cancer and gingivitis (BC/G =20); and patients without cancer with gingivitis (G=20). Clinical parameters \[Plaque Index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), Probing Depth (PS), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)\], hematological parameters (complete blood count), and salivary flow were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

Interventions

OTHERBasic Periodontal Therapy

All patients received oral hygiene instructions (interproximal cleaning with floss and interdental brushes, brushing instructions on the Bass technique). The patients were also encouraged to brush the back of the tongue once a day. Subsequently, all patients underwent supragingival scaling, prophylaxis, and polishing. Supragingival scaling was performed using manual instruments (Gracey curettes) and an ultrasonic device.

Sponsors

Daniela Bazan Palioto
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- All patients were diagnosed with localized gingivitis (G) The inclusion criteria were: At least 15 teeth; no loss of attachment and probing depth ≤ 3mm; bleeding on probing ≥ 10% of sites, no radiographic bone loss.

Exclusion criteria

1\) systemic diseases (e.g. diabetes, cardiovascular diseases) or autoimmune diseases in addition to cancer; 2) patients with periodontitis; 3) use of any medication that could interfere with periodontal aspects; 4) smokers; 5) Pregnant or lactating patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periodontal conditionsbefore and after post treatment (baseline, 6 weeks, 12 and 24 weeks)The plaque index (PI) was determined by analyzing the presence or absence of biofilm on the gingival margin, expressed as a percentage of surfaces with biofilm Bleeding on probing (BOP) was determined by detecting the presence or absence of bleeding, expressed as the percentage of bleeding surfaces. The probing depth (PD/mm) was expressed in millimeters, measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus. The clinical attachment level (CAL/mm) was expressed in millimeters, measured from the cementoenamel junction to the most apical portion of the gingival sulcus. Both BOP, PD, CAL were evaluated at six locations per tooth, i.e., three on the buccal surface and three on the lingual or palatal surface. Periodontal parameters (BOP, PD, CAL and PI ) are evaluated together or combined to perform periodontal diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary Flowbefore and after post treatment (baseline, 6 weeks, 12 and 24 weeks)The salivary flow rate was expressed in milliliters per minute (mL/min). Periodontal parameters and salivary flow will be combined to assess oral health.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026