Facial Swelling, Piezoelectric Technique, Tooth Avulsion, Tooth Diseases, Tooth Extraction Status Nos, Tooth, Impacted
Conditions
Keywords
third molar surgery, facial swelling, 3D facial swelling evaluation, Piezoelectric technique, tooth impacted, piezosurgery
Brief summary
The present study aims to analyze the effect of the piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
Detailed description
The present study aims to analyze the effect of of the piezoelectric technique n third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Facial swelling will be assessed using an innovative three-dimensional digital technique.
Interventions
Application of a new piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 18 to 32 years who required both M3M extractions were recruited * Good health status * Indication to surgical extraction of both M3M * Complete root formation * Surgical risk level classified as Conventional or Moderate according to - Daugela et al. classification
Exclusion criteria
* Person under the age of 18 or over 32 * Allergy or contraindications to administration of corticosteroids * Acute infection in any of the teeth to be extracted * Patients with chronic liver disease, diabetes, immune system dysfunction, or haematological disease * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * History of treatment with antiresorptive drugs * Chronic kidney disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Facial swelling qualitative analysis | Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery | To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using qualitative three-dimensional analysis (measured by colorimetric variation given by the overlapping volumes) . |
| Facial swelling quantitative analysis - volumetric differences | Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery | To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis ( volumes measured in cm3) . |
| Facial swelling quantitative analysis - linear differences | Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery | To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis (linear differences measured in cm2) . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Trismus analysis | Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery | To assess the effects of piezosurgery on trismus (measured in cm) |
| Pain analysis with Visual analogue scale (VAS) | Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery | To assess the effects of piezosurgery on pain (measured by VAS-score from 0 to 10 point, with 10 as the worst outcome. |
Countries
Italy