Skip to content

Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation

Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06212102
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-01-18
Start date
2024-05-08
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Infertility, IVF-ET, Poor ovarian responders, Double stimulation

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using progestin with GnRH antagonist to prevent premature LH surge in poor responders undergoing double stimulation protocol.

Interventions

DRUGProgestin primed ovarian stimulation

HMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Progestin (dydrogesterone) 30 mg/day was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS.

DRUGGnRH antagonist

HMG ( 300IU) was used during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (FPS) and during the luteal phase of ovarian stimulation (LPS). Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (Cetrorelix acetate) (0.2 mg) was used to prevent premature LH surge during the FPS and LPS.

Sponsors

Bedaya Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients belonging to Poseidon group 4

Exclusion criteria

* PCOS * Endometriosis * History of recurrent abortion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medications costs per retrieved oocyteTen to fifteen days after starting ovarian stimulation]Total cost of medications used in all cycles/number of retrieved oocytes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical pregnancy rate5 weeks after embryo transfer]Presence of intrauterine gestational sac detected by transvaginal ultrasound
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate18 weeks after embryo transfer]Pregnancies continued beyond 20 weeks gestation

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTUsama M Fouda, Prof.
umfrfouda@yahoo.com+201095401375
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSamar A Alhofy, M.D, Msc

Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 5, 2026