Skip to content

Periodontal Plastic Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Dehiscences After the Removal of Localized Gingival Enlargements

Periodontal Plastic Surgical Approaches to Correct Recession and Lack of Keratinized Tissue After Elimination of Localized Gingival Enlargements - a Case Series

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06210789
Enrollment
22
Registered
2024-01-18
Start date
2024-01-05
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Localized Gingival Enlargement, Epulides, Recurrence, Periodontal; Lesion

Keywords

Periodontal reconstructive surgery, Surgical excision, Surgical treatment, Localized Gingival Enlargement

Brief summary

Non-inflammatory recessions and Miller class I-II-III. mucogingival defects after elimination of localized gingival enlargements are frequently encountered challenges in the daily practice. In Miller class II-III. recessions the lack of keratinized tissues often compromise the maintenance a proper oral hygiene, this can cause inflammation, which can result in further periodontal attachment loss. In the literature there are some approaches that aim at widening of keratinized tissues and root coverage at the same time, such as the subperiosteal envelope technique (SET) (Allen 1994) combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) or a partially epithelialized connective tissue graft (PE-SCTG) (Stimmelmayr 2011). In the eradication of localized gingival enlargement postoperative complications following surgical removal, such as recurrence and subsequent gingival recessions as well as loss of keratinized tissues are commonly observed. Nevertheless, a state of the art comprehensive treatment approach has not been reported yet to overcome the above mentioned sequels. The aim of this study is to present a periodontal plastic surgical approach to definitively eliminate localized gingiva enlargements and to simultaneously correct consecutive Miller class I II-III. recessions, esthetic disturbances. (Ethical committee permission number: SE RKEB: 185/2020.)

Interventions

Periodontal plastic reconstruction of the subsequent soft tissue dehiscence after the surgical excision of the localized gingival enlargement

Sponsors

Semmelweis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Case series

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients older than 18 years * systematically healthy patients * localized gingival enlargement is present that involves maximum 3 teeth

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant women * medication intake that can potentially affect the oral mucosa and its healing * heavy smokers (\>=15)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence3 months, 6 monthsIf there is recurrence after the proper elimination of the enlargement and the one-staged reconstruction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Keratinized Gingiva Height1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThe height of the remaining keratinized gingiva
Gingival Recession1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsThe subsequent gingiva recession that remains after the elimination of the enlargement and the reconstruction of the soft tissue

Countries

Hungary

Contacts

Primary ContactBálint Molnár
molbal81@gmail.com+36 1 318 5222
Backup ContactAndrea Dobos
andobos@ucm.es+36309532140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026