Skip to content

Staph Intervention for Effective Local Defense

SHIELD (Staph Intervention for Effective Local Defense): An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy of a Sustained Intervention (Topical Antibiotics and Skin Antisepsis) to Decrease Staphylococcus Aureus Carriage in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06210594
Acronym
SHIELD
Enrollment
78
Registered
2024-01-18
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2025-11-14
Last updated
2026-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Staphylococcus Aureus Infection

Keywords

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Carriage density, Biomedical intervention

Brief summary

Indigenous persons experience a high burden of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) invasive disease and skin and soft tissue infections. SA carriage on the skin is factor for development of SA infections. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a community-informed approach to reduce carriage of SA. Participants will be assigned to education and household supplies for prevention of SA with and without a biomedical intervention. Researchers will compare SA carriage in the two groups.

Detailed description

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) and invasive infections in the United States (US). Infections caused by methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) are of particular concern because MRSA is harder to treat and associated with significant costs to healthcare systems and patients. The White Mountain Apache (WMA) Tribe experiences a higher burden of SA and MRSA infections than the general US population. Most cases of invasive SA occurred among adults with underlying conditions and led to significant morbidity. SA carriage is an important factor for development of SA infections. When individuals or the household contacts have recurrent SA infections, the use of antimicrobial or antiseptic agents to suppress or eliminate SA carriage (so called "decolonization") may be recommended to help prevent infection. While there are several regimens available to suppress carriage, each has limitations (e.g., potential antimicrobial resistance following repeated use of mupirocin antibiotic ointment, lack of access to a bathtub or reliable water supply for bleach baths). These interventions are typically used over a short period of time (e.g., one-time administration over 5-10 days). Re-acquisition of carriage in the months following completion of the carriage suppression regimen is common. Use of the standard approaches to SA carriage suppression in the WMA community has been inconsistent and has been insufficient to control SA disease. New approaches are urgently needed. In formative research conducted by the study team, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with healthcare providers and community members to understand the culture and context of tribal communities as related to SA infections, disease, and prevention. The researchers found that there are gaps in community knowledge about SA as a cause of skin infections and how to prevent an infection. When asked about preferred method of intervention to reduce SA carriage, participants indicated a preference for the antiseptic nasal spray (daily use) and antiseptic body wash (regular use), which were easily administered and could be incorporated into a daily routine. In this study, the investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA on the skin. Following informed consent, participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: A) education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N = 50; Group A); or B) education/household supplies alone (N = 50; Group B). The antiseptic regimen will consist of twice daily Nozin nasal antiseptic plus chlorhexidine gluconate wash three times a week. Participants assigned to Group A will continue the antiseptic regimen for 4 months. All participants will be followed for 4 months. Study visits will occur at baseline (Day 0) and Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120. At each visit, a questionnaire will be administered and swabs will be collected at common carriage sites on the body (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin). Group A will also receive reminder text messages or phone calls at a frequency of choice (e.g., once per day or once per week). After the Day 0 and Day 120 visits, the participant's medical record will be reviewed to document relevant medical history and outpatient and inpatient visits for SSTI and SA-related infections. A home visit will be scheduled after Day 0 to collect environmental swabs at frequent hand-contact sites (e.g., bedroom, living room, bathroom) and swabs from indoor pet cats and dogs (e.g., dorsal fur and skin of groin). Household members will also be recruited to complete a brief questionnaire and sample collection (anterior nares, oropharynx, and groin). A qualitative assessment will be conducted in a subset of index participants (n=6-10) in Group A to assess adherence and acceptability of the prevention regimen. Participants will be chosen using purposive sampling to represent a range of reported adherence at the D60 visit and invited to provide informed consent. The qualitative assessment will consist of one in-depth interview at the endpoint (4 months).

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTMupirocin + Nozin + chlorhexidine gluconate

Education/household supplies + antibiotic + antiseptic regimen

BEHAVIORALEducation + Household supplies

Education/household supplies

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study will be an open-label randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a carriage suppression regimen in reducing the prevalence of SA carriage and SA infections among adults at high risk of SA infections who are currently carrying SA in the oropharynx or anterior nares. Participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either: 1. education about SA and receipt of household supplies to reduce SA transmission in the home plus use of a nasal antibiotic twice daily for 5 days then maintenance with an antiseptic regimen (N=50; intervention group); or 2. education/household supplies alone (N = 50; control group). All participants will be followed for 4 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Native American adult living on or adjacent to the WMA Tribal lands * 18 years of age and older * Lab-confirmed SA carriage at time of enrollment * Ability to provide written informed consent * Ability to comply with follow-up activities * Risk factor for SA-associated infection: Diagnosed with diabetes OR body mass index ≥30 OR documented SSTI or SA infection in the past 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* Immediate family member of study staff * Allergy to citrus or any ingredient in Nozin, Hibiclens, or mupirocin * Without a permanent home (e.g., living in a group home, shelter, or is unhoused) * Use of antibiotics within 30 days prior to the first study visit (time-limited) * Current SA infection (time-limited)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of SA carriage4 months after randomizationCompare SA carriage prevalence in the nose, throat, and skin (any site) between arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and Acceptability4 monthsProportion adhering to intervention.
Feasibility and Acceptability as assessed by in depth interviews4 monthsAssess the feasibility and acceptability qualitatively through in-depth interviews (with a subset of participants).
Incidence of SSTI4 monthsCompare the incidence of skin and soft tissue infections (all cause) between arms.
Characterize SA isolates4 monthsCharacterize SA isolates, including lineages (proportion belonging to each clonal complex) and antimicrobial resistance (proportion MRSA), during follow-up in both arms.
Confirmed SA infection4 monthsCompare the incidence of lab-confirmed SA infection (all types and SSTI separately) between arms.
Prevalence of SA carriage in index participants, household members, indoor pets, and household surfacesBaseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 90, day 120Describe baseline prevalence of SA carriage in index patients, household members, indoor pets, and household surfaces, and longitudinal prevalence in index participants, and compare between arms.
Adverse events4 monthsThe proportion of participants with adverse events (e.g., dry skin) and compare between arms.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLaura Hammitt, MD

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026