Skip to content

The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in General Practice

The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients With Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Danish General Practice: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06210282
Acronym
PLUS-FLUS
Enrollment
391
Registered
2024-01-18
Start date
2023-11-03
Completion date
2024-10-17
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community Acquired Pneumonia, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Keywords

Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, Community Acquired Pneumonia, Lung Ultrasound, Point-of-care Ultrasound, General Practice, Antibiotics

Brief summary

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to determine if adults presenting with symptoms of an acute lower respiratory tract infection in general practice where the general practitioner suspects CAP, who have FLUS performed as an addition to usual care, have antibiotics prescribed less frequent compared to those given usual care only.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFocused lung ultrasound (FLUS)

We will use a 14-zone scanning approach. Each hemithorax is divided into anterior, lateral, and posterior surfaces. The anterior and lateral surfaces on each hemithorax are divided into an upper and lower quadrant. The posterior surfaces on each hemithorax are divided into an upper, middle, and lower quadrant. Each quadrant represents a scanning zone. Each scanning zone should be assessed using FLUS. The participating general practitioners use point-of-care ultrasound on a weekly basis before trial commencement and will use the ultrasonography device already available to them.

OTHERUsual Care

Participants assigned to the control group will receive the GP's usual care of adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms of an acute LRTI where the GP suspects CAP. Usual care will be used as a pragmatic comparator to reflect the current standard examinations and care of these patients in general practices in Denmark. Usual care is recommended to follow applicable guidelines from the Danish Society of General Practitioners (DSAM) and Lægehåndbogen \[The Doctor's Handbook\].

Sponsors

Aalborg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. Acute cough (\< 21 days). 3. At least one other symptom of acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). 4. The general practitioner suspects a bacterial community-acquired pneumonia.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous antibiotic treatment for the current episode of acute LRTI. 2. The patient is not listed with the general practitioner (no medical record available). 3. The patient is not capable of understanding and signing informed consent. 4. The patient does not wish to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antibiotics prescribed at index consultationDay 0The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at index consultation (day 0) reported by the GP at index consultation. We will assess the effect of adding FLUS to usual care on antibiotics prescribed at index consultation by investigating if there is a difference between groups in the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at index consultation..

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days with symptoms being a moderate problem or worseFrom day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.Number of days with symptoms rated a moderate problem or worse by the participants in groups (at least one item with score 3 or above) (mean/median).
Days signed in sick/cancelled work-related activitiesFrom day 0 until the participant has scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.Number of days participants signed in sick/cancelled work-related activities or cancelled leisure activities (mean/median) in groups.
Satisfaction with the index consultationDay 0Proportion of participants satisfied or very satisfied (4 or 5) with the index consultation on a 5-point Likert scale.
Antibiotics prescribed as delayed antibiotic prescriptionDay 0Proportion of antibiotics prescribed as delayed antibiotic prescriptions at index consultation (day 0).
Antibiotics prescribed during follow-upUp until day 28Proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed within 7 and 28 days after index consultation.
Re-consultationsUp until day 28.Proportion of participants with re-consultations, defined as any primary care contacts (general practice or out-of-hour services), within 28 days after index consultation.
Admission to hospitalUp until day 28.Proportion of participants admitted to hospital within 28 days after index consultation.
Daily total LRTI symptom-scoreFrom day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.Daily total LRTI symptom-score in groups, calculated as sum of scores of six symptoms (minimum 0 - maximum 36) (mean/median). Participants will be asked to complete a validated LRTI symptom diary every day from day 0 up until day 21. The recorded items include the following six symptoms of LRTI: cough, dyspnea, sputum production, well-being, sleep disturbance, and activity disturbance. The participants will be asked to consider how bad each symptom has been, over the past 24 hours by scoring each symptom on a 7-point Likert-scale (0 = no problem, 1 = very little problem, 2 = slight problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = bad problem, 5 = very bad problem, and 6 = as bad as it could be).
Other imaging than FLUS performedUp until day 28.Proportion of participants with other imaging than FLUS (any imaging performed in secondary health care services) performed within 28 days after index consultation.
Types of other imaging performedUp until day 28.Types of other imaging than FLUS performed within 28 days after index consultation.
Referred with suspicion of cancerUp until day 60.Proportion of participants referred with suspicion of cancer within 60 days after index consultation.
Diagnoses of cancerUp until day 60.Proportion of participants in groups diagnosed with cancer within 60 days after index consultation.
Spontaneously reported unintended eventsUp until day 60.Number of spontaneously reported unintended events up until 60 days after index consultation.
MortalityUp until day 28 and 60.All-cause mortality up until day 28 and day 60.
ComplicationsUp until day 28.Proportion of participants with complications (pleural infection (defined as complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema), lung abscess, or sepsis) during admission to hospital within 28 days after index consultation.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026