Skip to content

RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06209931
Enrollment
160
Registered
2024-01-18
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stone

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the safety and efficacy between RIRS with tip flexible pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath and mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy(PCNL) for the treatment of 2-3-cm kidney stones.

Detailed description

Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery (RIRS) has become one of the most common treatments for renal stones. The development of ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a significant advance in RIRS. In recent years, various improvements have been made to UAS, especially the emergence of a suction UAS and a tip flexible UAS. Using the advantages of suction and tip flexible technology, our team developed a tip flexible pressure-controlling UAS, which significantly improves the safety and effectiveness of RIRS. However, the current guidelines can recommend the indication of RIRS in kidney stones less than 2cm, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) is still preferred for kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Therefore, this study is the first to compare the safety and efficacy between RIRS with tip flexible pressure-controlling UAS and mini PCNL in the treatment of 2 to 3 cm kidney stones.

Interventions

PROCEDURERIRS

RIRS with tip flexible pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath versus mini PCNL for the treatment of 2-3-cm kidney stones

Sponsors

The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥ 18 years * American Society of Anesthesiology score 1-2 * Kidney stone diameter of 2-3 cm confirmed by CT * Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes adherence with the requirements of the trial

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with abnormal urinary tract anatomy (such as horseshoe kidney or ileal conduit) * Patients with uncontrolled UTI * Patients with health or other factors that are absolute contraindications to RIRS or PCNL .Patients unable to understand or complete trial documentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate stone-free ratePostoperative day 1-7No residual stone or stone fragments less than 2 mm on low-dose CT scan at postoperative day 1-7 are defined as stone free.
Stone-free rate at 1 monthsPostoperative 1 monthNo residual stone or stone fragments less than 2 mm on kidney, ureter, and bladder at 1 months are defined as stone free.
Complications up to 3 months postPostoperative 3 month
Operation timethe time from the insertion of the suction sheath and renal puncture to the end of the operation,assessed up to 90 minutes.The operation time of RIRS and mini PCNL was defined as the time from the insertion of the suction sheath and renal puncture to the end of the operation

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXin Huang, M.D.
sysuhuangxin@126.com0086-0797-5889867

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026