Skip to content

Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding on Dysphagic Patients With Parkinson Disease

A Randomized Trial to Explore the Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding on Dysphagic Patients With Parkinson Disease

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06206122
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-01-16
Start date
2024-01-05
Completion date
2024-04-05
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

The goal of this or clinical trial is to explore Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer are: • Can stellate ganglion block improve the nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease, better than Nasogastric Tube Feeding. Participants will be divided into the control group and observation group evenly. All the patients were provided with routine therapy and given nutritional support by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding respectively. The nutritional status, swallowing function, and activities of daily living of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were evaluated.

Detailed description

Nasogastric tube feeding has been widely used in patients with Parkinson's disease but has a significant risk of complications. Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding is an established enteral nutrition approach that can be used with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The goal of this or clinical trial is to explore Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer are: • Can stellate ganglion block improve the nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease, better than Nasogastric Tube Feeding. Participants will be divided into the control group and observation group evenly. All the patients were provided with routine therapy and given nutritional support by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding respectively. The nutritional status, swallowing function, and activities of daily living of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were evaluated.

Interventions

DEVICENasogastric tube

Besides, the control group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient's condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.

The observation group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

1. Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. 2. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training. 3. Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.

Sponsors

Zeng Changhao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years. * Meeting the diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease developed by the Neurology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association in 2006. * Diagnosed with dysphagia confirmed by the video fluoroscopic swallowing study. * Water swallow test\> Level 3. * Stable vital signs, conscious, able to cooperate with assessment and treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Dysphagia possibly caused by other reasons, such as cerebrovascular disease, trauma, neuromuscular diseases, malignant diseases of the pharynx and larynx, and digestive tract diseases. * Complicated with cognitive impairment or consciousness dysfunction. * Simultaneously suffering from severe liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases. * Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Studyday 1 and day 15Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study, which is considered as the gold standard, swallowing process is divided into four periods: cognitive, oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal periods with a total score of 10 and a higher score indicates better swallowing ability (less dysphagia).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Oral Intake Scaleday 1 and day 15During Dysphagia-Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment, evaluators engage in communication with the patient, conduct observations, and make records to assess the patient's oral intake ability. The Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment form includes seven levels of scoring, ranging from level 1 to level 7, indicating a progressive improvement in the patient's oral intake ability. In general, the result below level 6 indicates unsafe for oral intake while level 6 and above indicates that eating via mouth can be safely conducted.
Serum albuminday 1 and day 15Serum albumin was recorded via blood routine test.(Alb, g/L)
Hemoglobinday 1 and day 15Hemoglobin was recorded via blood routine test.(Hb, mg/L)
Modified Barthel Indexday 1 and day 15The activities of daily living was assessed utilizing the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). Modified Barthel Index includes the following 10 subscales. For each subscale, choices encoded with the score 10, 8, 5, 2, 0 are set with the decreasing level of self-dependence, while the final total is positively correlated with Activities of daily living. Cronbach's α of questionnaire adopted is 0.916.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026