Noticing Nutrition Information, Recalling Nutrition Information
Conditions
Brief summary
To assess the relative noticeability of the following added-sugar menu label elements using a factorial experiment: label type (icon-only vs. icon-plus-text label vs. boxed icon), color (black vs. red), size (100% vs. 150% of the height of the menu item text), and placement (left vs. right side of item).
Detailed description
The objective of this aim is to assess the relative noticeability of legally-viable added-sugar menu label characteristics. The investigators will use a between-subject experiment with a factorial design. Participants will be randomized to label type (icon-only vs. icon-plus-text label vs. boxed icon), color (black vs. red), size (100% vs. 150% of the height of the menu item text), and placement (left vs. right side of item). This results in 24 arms of the experiment. The primary outcomes are noticing a nutrition label and recognition of the label. Secondary outcomes are knowledge of items that are high in added sugar and perceived message effectiveness (PME) of labels. For dichotomous outcomes (e.g., noticing the label, recalling label meaning), the investigators will directly estimate the probability ratio using Poisson regression with a robust error variance, regressing the outcome on an indicator for the level of the factor. For continuous outcomes (e.g., knowledge, PME scale), the investigators will use linear regression models regressing the outcome on an indicator for experimental condition. A critical alpha 0.05 will be used, and statistical tests will be two-tailed. Exploratory outcomes include selection of ≥1 item high in added sugar and grams of sugar ordered from each menu, analyzed using the methods described above. The investigators will also explore proportions or means for the following process measures about reactions to the warning labels: Perception that the labels grabbed attention and support for an added sugars warning label policy. Additionally, the investigators will explore differences in the primary outcomes between each of the 24 unique conditions. If there is evidence of interactions between label elements, investigators will modify the modeling approach to account for those interactions (e.g., using interaction terms and stratified models).The investigators will use multiple testing corrections for families of outcomes (primary and secondary).
Interventions
OTHERMenu label
Participants will select food items from two restaurant menus, displayed with labels as specified by their assigned group
Sponsors
University of California, Davis
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Equal or greater than 18 years of age- * Less than 100 years of age * English-speaking * U.S. residents * Participants will reflect the U.S. Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey 5-year estimates for gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and age
Exclusion criteria
* Failing the attention check question * Completing the survey in less than 33% of the median completion time
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Noticing and recall of added-sugar nutrient label - dichotomous variable Correct (Answered Yes to noticing, answered Added sugars to recall, and answered high for high low recall question) or Incorrect (otherwise) | up to approximately 1 minute | Noticing a nutrition label - Measured with Think back to the beginning of this survey when you imagined you were ordering dinner from restaurant menus. Did you notice any nutrition labels (other than the calories) next to any of the menu items? Response options are Yes, No, and Don't know. Recalling the label's meaning - \[If answered Yes\] Measured with What did the nutrition label tell you about? Response options are (displayed in survey in a random order) Sodium, Added sugars, Trans fats, Fiber, Calcium, Healthy items, Unhealthy items, Vegetarian, Organic, Gluten-free, Sustainable, None of these, Not sure. High/low - \[If answered Added sugars\] What did the label tell you about added sugars? Response options are High in added sugars, Low in added sugars, Something else, I don't know. There is no formal name for this measure/scale. |
| Recognition of label - dichotomous variable Correct (selected the label they were assigned to or Incorrect (any other option). | up to approximately 1 minute | Measured with Please look at the following labels and select which label (if any) you saw on the menus while selecting your food and beverage items. Response options will include images of 7 labels with the designs based on the participant's assigned color (black vs red) and label type (icon-only vs. boxed-icon vs, boxed icon-plus-text label) and the options, Not sure and None of these. There is no formal name for this measure/scale. It was developed for this study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of menu items high in added sugar - continuous variable using the percent of 8 items correctly classified | up to approximately 2 minutes | Measured with (While viewing menu excerpt) Click on the menu items that you think have more than half the daily limit for added sugars. Higher percents of items correctly classified represent more knowledge. |
| Perceived Message Effectiveness of label - continuous variable based on a 3-item scale in which each item uses a 1-5 response scale | up to approximately 2 minutes | Measured with 3-item University of North Carolina Perceived Message Effectiveness Scale: How much does this label make you concerned about the health effects of consuming menu items high in added sugars?, How much does this label makes consuming menu items high in added sugars seem unpleasant?, and How much does this label discourage you from wanting to consume menu items high in added sugars?. Response options include a 1-5 scale where higher values represent higher amounts of the construct. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Selection of at least one item high in added sugar | up to approximately 2 minutes | Exploratory outcome, dichotomous - Yes (ordered at least one item high in added sugar) or No (did not order any items high in added sugar), analyzed using Poisson regression to examine differences between factor levels |
| Grams of sugar ordered | up to approximately 2 minutes | Exploratory outcome, continuous - total grams of sugar in menu items selected, analyzed using linear regression to examine differences between factor levels |
| Perception that the labels grabbed attention | up to approximately 1 minute | Exploratory outcome, continuous - 1-5 Likert scale, descriptive analysis of proportions and means to examine differences between factor levels |
| Support for an added sugars warning label policy | up to approximately 1 minute | Exploratory outcome, continuous - 1-5 Likert scale, descriptive analysis of proportions and means to examine differences between factor levels |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed