Educational Activities
Conditions
Keywords
Pacemaker,, Meleis Transition Theory,, Education,, Self-Efficacy,, Anxiety, Depression,, Nursing
Brief summary
This study will be carried out to determine the effect of training given according to Meleis's Transition Theory to patients with pacemaker implantation on anxiety, depression and self-efficacy levels.
Detailed description
This study will be carried out to determine the effect of training given according to Meleis's Transition Theory to patients with pacemaker implantation on anxiety, depression and self-efficacy levels. Hypotheses of the Research H01: Training given to patients with pacemaker implantation according to Meleis's Transition Theory does not affect the anxiety and depression levels of the patients. H11: Training given according to Meleis's Transition Theory to patients with pacemaker implants reduces the anxiety and depression levels of patients. H02: Training given to patients with pacemaker implantation according to Meleis's Transition Theory does not affect the self-efficacy level of the patients. H12: Training given to patients with pacemakers according to Meleis's Transition Theory increases the self-efficacy level of the patients.
Interventions
OTHEREducation According to Meleis' Transitional Theory to Patients With Pacemaker
Patients in the experimental group will be trained according to Meleis's Transition Theory.
Sponsors
Ordu University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Block randomization
Intervention model description
Trial model with pretest posttest control group
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with pacemaker implantation, * Ages 18 and over, * The one who is literate, * Open to communication and collaboration, * Patients who volunteer to participate in the study will be included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Not oriented to person, place and time, * Hearing loss, * Cannot understand and speak Turkish and * Patients who do not want to continue the study will be excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | month 1 | The scale was developed by Zigmond and Snaith (1983) to determine the risk of anxiety and depression in patients and was translated into Turkish by Aydemir et al. Adapted from (1997). It consists of a total of 14 questions, odd numbered questions measure anxiety, and even numbered questions measure depression. The scale provides four-point Likert type measurement. In scoring; Items 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 13 are in the format 3,2,1,0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 14. The items are scored as 0,1,2,3. By summing the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th and 13th items of the anxiety subscale of the scale, the depression subscale; It is calculated by adding the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th and 14th items. The cut-off score for the anxiety subscale is 10/11 and for the depression subscale is 7/8. Accordingly, areas above these scores are considered at risk. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Efficacy Scale in Chronic Diseases | month 1 | The scale was developed by Lorig et al. (1996) in 1996 to measure the self-efficacy perceptions of individuals with chronic diseases and was adapted into Turkish by Ceyhan and Ünsal (2017). The scale generally consists of three main concepts and a total of 10 sub-dimensions. In order to realize the first concept, Self-management behaviors, under the heading of PE; The sub-dimensions include doing regular sports, getting information about the disease, getting help from society, family and friends, and communicating with the doctor. The scale is answered in Likert type, increasing from 0 to 10, which determines the perception of PE. The number 0 on the scale represe |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed