Skip to content

The Derivation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Those With Low Back Pain Who Will Respond Favorably to Intramuscular Dry-needling

The Derivation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Those With Low Back Pain Who Will

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06204055
Enrollment
85
Registered
2024-01-12
Start date
2024-01-31
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2024-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low Back Pain, Dry-Needling, Myofascial Pain, Treatment Based Classification

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate specific clinical characteristics, amongst those with low back pain, that identify patient appropriateness for Intermuscular Dry-Needling (IMDN) and to develop a prediction tool that can be used by clinicians.

Detailed description

The aim of the CPR is to identify patients with LBP who are likely to benefit from IMDN. Improvement of patient-reported outcomes and clinical measures of pain are the outcomes being predicted by the model. The CPR will be developed in a double-phase design. The first phase will be an RCT, 2 x 3 group (IMDN or Sham) by time (pretest, post-treatment week 1, post-treatment week 2, posttest, follow-up) with repeated measures on timeframe. This design will establish if improvement of patient reported outcomes and clinical measures of pain are achieved because of the IMDN treatment. Furthermore, each group will receive the same type and volume of lumbar and hip stretching exercises in conjunction with their assigned needling regimen. The second phase will utilize logistic regression analysis to identify associations between the groups' demographic, historical, clinical variables and short-term pain and disability outcomes. This type of analysis will be able to identify strong predictors of the treatment outcome. Various processes will be used to determine optimal model fit for analysis.

Interventions

OTHERIntramuscular Dry-Needling

It is a minimally invasive procedure where a solid filament needle is inserted deeply into a myofascial trigger point (MTrP) within a muscle in an attempt to abate it and illicit a desired treatment effect.

Sponsors

Whitworth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

After the physical examination has been performed, each participant will be randomized to receive IMDN or SIMDN. Randomization will be completed by use of a computer-generated list of random numbers that will designate group assignment. The PI will inform the study PTs of the participants group assignment. The list will be maintained by a research assistant who is not involved with participant recruitment, examination or treatment. Participants will be blinded to group assignment.

Intervention model description

The first phase will be an RCT, 2 x 3 group (IMDN or Sham) by time (pretest, post-treatment week 1, post-treatment week 2, posttest, follow-up) with repeated measures on timeframe. The second phase will utilize logistic regression analysis to identify associations between the groups' demographic, historical, clinical variables and short-term pain and disability outcomes. This type of analysis will be able to identify strong predictors of the treatment outcome. Various processes will be used to determine optimal model fit for analysis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females between the ages of 18 and 60 years with non-traumatic low back pain between the 12th rib and the buttock region. * Participants must also report an Oswestry Disability Index score of at least 20/100 points.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants must be able to speak and read English. * Individuals who are currently pregnant, currently taking pain narcotic medication or have had a prior surgery in the lumbosacral spine * Those participants whose BMI is greater than 35

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline, week 1, week 2 and week 3self reported questionnaire that is used to measure a patient's permanent functional disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fear-Avoidance Beliefs QuestionnaireBaseline, week 1, week 2 and week 3self reported questionnaire that is used to measure a patient's fear associated with movement and/or work
11 point Numeric Pain-Rating ScaleBaseline, week 1, week 2 and week 3self reported scale that is used to rate subjective intensity of back and leg pain

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDominic J Severino, PT,DPT
dseverino@whitworth.edu5097774687

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026