Skip to content

Vascular Closure With Novel External Compression Device: The LockeT Study

Vascular Closure With Novel External Compression Device After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The LockeT Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06199414
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-01-10
Start date
2024-01-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Hemostasis

Brief summary

Single center, retrospective review study comparing Figure of Eight suture to LockeT, enrolling approximately 70 patients.

Detailed description

The volume of catheter ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias are on the rise in the United States and worldwide. Despite refinement in ablation tools and techniques which has led to a significant decline in complication rates, achieving vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths remains a challenge. Manual compression (MC) the current standard of care, requires bedrest, often up to 8 hours. This prolonged bedrest is associated with longer length of stay and at times complications from indwelling catheters. Other methods of vascular closure include figure-of-eight (F-8) a, subcutaneous suture or Z-stitch or fellow's stitch has been evaluated as a means to achieve homeostasis following major cardiovascular procedures. One pooled meta-analysis of six studies including 982 patients demonstrated that F-8 is safe and effective means of achieving hemostasis. In comparison to MC time to hemostasis was significantly lower and overall access site complications like hematoma, bleeding was also noted to be lower in F-8 group. In recent years, invasive, vascular closure devices have become popular. However, results continue to suggest that the risk versus benefit has not been definitively demonstrated. LockeT is a new suture retention device designed to closely mimic manual compression without the need for a healthcare professional to stand bedside.

Interventions

DEVICEVenous Closure

Vascular closure to achieve vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths in catheter ablation procedures

Sponsors

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All participants must meet the following criteria to be included in this study. * Subjects must be at least 18 years of age. * Subjects underwent Atrial Fibrillation radiofrequency ablation procedure. * Subjects must have undergone F-8 or LockeT for venous closure.

Exclusion criteria

If a subject meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study participation. * Subjects under the age of 18. * Subject's electrophysiology procedure is not planned to access the left atrium or ventricle. * Subjects in which F-8 or a LockeT was not used. * If the EP physician detected a formed hematoma prior to venous closure, that patient will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of LockeT device - Time to no oozing/hemostasis1 weekTo assess the effectiveness of using LockeT to retain sutures and pressure to gain hemostasis after venous procedures. Time to no oozing/hemostasis (mins/hours)
Effectiveness of LockeT device - Time to Ambulate1 weekTo assess the effectiveness of using LockeT to retain sutures and pressure to gain hemostasis after venous procedures. Time to no oozing/hemostasis (mins/hours)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDonita Atkins
datkins@kchrf.com816-651-1969

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026