Skip to content

Targeted Treatment Plus Tislelizumab and HAIC for Advanced CRCLM Failed From Standard Systemic Treatment

Targeted Treatment Based on ctDNA Genotyping Combined With Tislelizumab and HAIC as Salvage Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Failed From Standard Systemic Treatment (SALVLIV Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06199232
Enrollment
47
Registered
2024-01-10
Start date
2024-01-23
Completion date
2026-07-10
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ctDNA Genotype, Failed From Standard Treatment, Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer, MSS

Keywords

hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, targeted therapy, tislelizumab, ctDNA genotype, MSS CRCLM

Brief summary

Hepatic arterial infuison chemothearpy (HAIC), targeted therapy, and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). Thus, the investigators will conduct a prospective trial to explore the efficacy and safety of targeted treatment based on genotyping or ctDNA genotyping combined with tislelizumab and HAIC as salvage treatment for advanced CRCLM failed from standard systemic treatment, aiming to provide individualized optimized regimen for microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCLM in salvage treatment.

Detailed description

Although surgery has been demonstrated to improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM), only 20% of patients with CRCLM is candidate for surger. Irinotecan-/oxaliplatin-based doublet/triplet chemotherapy regimen combined with targeted therapy (anti vascular endothelial growth factor \[VEFG\] or anti epidermal growth factor receptor \[EGFR\]) based on the genotype are recommended as standard first- and second-line treatment for unresectabel metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by NCCN guideline. RAS and BRAF are the important signal members in the EGFR signal pathway, and the mutation of them could induce the persistent activation of the downstream of the MAPK pathway, leading to the differentiation, proliferation, and growth change of the tumor cell. The status of RAS and BRAF V600E mutation will affect the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy, but not anti-VEGF therapy. Regorafenib, fruquintinb, and TAS-102 have been recommended as third-line treatment for mCRC, while the survivl benefits from these agents are limited, with the median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS of 1.9-3.7 months and 6.4-9.3 months, respectively. The efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for CRCLM have been demonstrated by multiple trials and recommended by many guidelines worldwide. Fruquintinib, a small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting at VEGF 1-3, has been demonstrated to change the tumor microenvironment and enhance the anti-tumor effect of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. Anti-EGFR rechallenge (cetuximab rechallenge) was effective in patients with CRC who interrupted the anti-EGFR therapy while responsed to anti-EGFR therapy in the first-line treatment. In 2021, a phase II trial, which explore the efficacy and safety of cetuximab rechallenge combined with Avelumab for pretreated RAS wide type (WT) mCRC. Our retrospective study (unpublished) showed HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab presented greater efficacy for MSS CRCLM. Thus, the investigators will conduct a prospective trial to explore the efficacy and safety of targeted treatment based on genotyping or ctDNA genotyping combined with tislelizumab and HAIC as salvage treatment for advanced CRCLM failed from standard systemic treatment, aiming to provide individualized optimized regimen for MSS CRCLM in salvage treatment.

Interventions

DRUGHAIC+targeted therapy+PD-1 inhibitor

HAIC regimen: doublet or triplet regimen based on the response and adverse events occurred in the previous standard treatment (depended on the decision of researchers)-oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, split into d1 and d2, 0-2h,) and 5-fluorouracial (2g/m2, split into d1 and d2, 2-24h)/ oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2, 0-2h, d1), irinotecan (100 mg/m2, 0-2h, d2), and 5-fluorouracial (2g/m2, split in d1 and d2, 2-24h), repeated every 4 weeks; drug-eluting TACE will be performed at 3rd-4th cycles if the lesions in liver is abundant with blood supply. Tislelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor): 200 mg, intravenous drip for 30-60 minutes before 24h of HAIC, q4w. Cetuximab (Group A, KRAS/NRAK/BRAF/EGFR wide type and interrupt cetuximab more than 3 months): 500 mg/m2, intravenous drip before HAIC, q4w. Fruquintinib (Group B, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/EGFR mutation type and wide type but treated with cetuximab in last 3 months): 3 mg/d, d3-23, then suspend for 1w.

Sponsors

Peking University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-80 years old. 2. Colorectal cancer confirmed by histopatology. 3. The metastasis is mainly located in liver. 4. Unresectable liver metastasis is confirmed by CT/MRI scan and multidisciplinary. 5. Failed from standard first- and second-line systemic treatment. 6. At least one measurable lesion according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines (mRECIST). 7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \<2. 8. Child-Pugh A or B (≤ 7). 9. Expectant survival time ≥ 3 months. 10. Adequate organ function as follows: 1. Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L; 2. Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5×10\^9/L; 3. Blood platelet count ≥ 775×10\^9/L; 4. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 5 times of upper limit of normal (ULN); 5. Total bilirubin ≤ 2 times of ULN; 6. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times of ULN; 7. Albumin ≥ 30 g/L. 11. Patients sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Extensive extrahepatic metastasis (\>25% of tumor burden in liver). 2. HER2 (3+) or HER2 amplification. 3. MSI-H or dMMR. 4. Allergic to contrast media. 5. Pregnant or lactational. 6. Allergic to oxaliplatin or cetuximab. 7. Coinstantaneous a lot of malignant hydrothorax or ascites. 8. History of organ transplantation (including bone marrow auto-transplantation and peripheral stem cell transplantation). 9. Coinstantaneous infection and need anti-infection therapy. 10. Coinstantaneous peripheral nervous system disorder. 11. History of obvious mental disorder and central nervous system disorder. 12. Concomitant malignancy within 5 years, except for non-melanoma skin cancer and carcinoma in situ of cervix. 13. Without legal capacity. 14. Impact the study because of medical or ethical reasons. 15. Clinically severe gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months of the start of treatment or any life-threatening bleeding events within 3 months of the start of treatment. 16. Uncorrectable coagulation disorder. 17. Obvious abnormal in ECG or obvious clinical symptoms of heart disease, like congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease with obvious clinical symptoms, unmanageable arrhythmia and hypertension. 18. History of myocardial infarction within 12 months, or Grade III/IV of heart function. 19. Severe liver disease (like cirrhosis), renal disease, respiratory disease, unmanageable diabetes or other kinds of systematic disease. 20. Any other subjects that the investigator considers ineligible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS rate at 6 monthsFrom the date of treatment begining to the date of 6 months after the treatment begining.Proportion of patients with 6- month progression-free survival after treatment begining in all patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFSFrom date of treatment beginning until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 monthsThe time from treatment initiation to the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs firstly
OSFrom date of treatment beginning until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 100 monthsThe time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause
intrahepatic PFSFrom date of treatment beginning until the date of first documented progression in liver or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 monthsThe time from treatment initiation to the first documented disease progression in liver or death due to any cause, whichever occurs firstly
ORREvaluation of tumor burden based on mRECIST criteria through study completion, an average of once per 3 months.The proportion of participants in the analysis population who have complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined by investigators using mRECIST criteria at any time during the study.
DCREvaluation of tumor burden based on mRECIST criteria through study completion, an average of once per 3 months.The proportion of participants in the analysis population who have complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) determined by investigators using mRECIST criteria at any time during the study.
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse eventsThrough study completion, an average of once per 1 month.Number of patients with AE, treatment-related AE (TRAE), serious adverse event (SAE) assessed by CTCAE v5.0.

Countries

China

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORXiaodong Wang, M.D.

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026