Skip to content

Misdiagnosis Between Interstitial Lung Disease and Cardiac Patients

Interstitial Lung Disease Misdiagnosis in Cardiac Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06198608
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-01-10
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ILD

Brief summary

Aim of the study To determine the frequency misdiagnosis of cardiac congestion as interstitial lung disease based on initial High Resolution CT interpretation alone. To identify specific HRCT findings that are more commonly associated with misdiagnosis versus correct diagnosis of the underlying condition. To establish diagnostic criteria or HRCT patterns that distinguish cardiac congestion from interstitial lung disease

Detailed description

Observational study of 150 patients found that cardiac congestion was misdiagnosed as interstitial lung disease in 24% of cases on initial HRCT imaging alone. Echocardiography and clinical correlation were needed to make the correct diagnosis . Misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate treatment with immunosuppressive drugs which could exacerbate right heart failure in patients who actually have cardiac congestion. Correct diagnosis is important for prognosis and management. Subtle findings like upper lobe predominance of opacities, septal lines and a mosaic attenuation pattern on HRCT favor interstitial lung disease, while diffuse ground glass with central and perihilar distribution favors cardiac congestion . Associated findings on HRCT like enlarged cardiac silhouette, pleural and pericardial effusions help suggest the diagnosis of cardiac congestion over idiopathic interstitial pneumonia . Integrating clinical data on risk factors for heart failure, echocardiography findings and follow-up imaging response to diuretic therapy can help differentiate the two conditions when HRCT is non-specific

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent HRCT imaging of the chest for evaluation of suspected interstitial lung disease * Initial radiology report included a definitive diagnosis of interstitial lung disease patterns * Age 18+ years * No prior history of pulmonary or cardiac

Exclusion criteria

* Inconclusive or unclear initial HRCT report * Underlying diagnosis other than interstitial lung disease or cardiac congestion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of initial HRCT interpretationbaseline(percentage of cases initially read as interstitial lung disease that were later found to be cardiac congestion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to correct diagnosisbaselineMean or median number of days/months between initial misdiagnosis on HRCT and reaching accurate diagnosis of cardiac congestion

Contacts

Primary ContactHend saleh, MD
hend.m.saleh@gmail.com01098988712
Backup ContactMohamed Abdalrahman, MD
dr.mga2011@aun.edu.eg0102660007

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 6, 2026