Skip to content

Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP

Comparison of Off-site vs. hands-on Assistance for Trainees During ERCP: a Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06197815
Enrollment
754
Registered
2024-01-09
Start date
2020-12-03
Completion date
2024-08-31
Last updated
2024-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ERCP Training

Brief summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure. It takes time to learn the basic skill and at least 180 - 200 cases for trainees to achieve competency in ERCP. Hands-on practice in patients remains the gold standard for ERCP training. It required the trainer to stand by the trainee in the procedure room to assist. There were insufficient patients for most trainees to achieve competence until the trainee graduate. Technology-enabled health care at a distance has profound scientific potential and accordingly has been met with growing interest. We hypothesized that the trainee can be safely guided by a senior trainer off-site with the endoscopic view displayed on a screen. Using the teleguidance, the trainer can even continue to provide guidance when the trainees complete their training and return to their hospitals until they achieve the recommended clinical competency. Given the advantages of the off-site teleguidance, it could be an attractive substitute for hands-on assistance to ERCP training. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-site assistance (OA group) could achieve a comparable success rate to standard hands-on assistance (HA group) with regard to the rates of successful selective biliary cannulation during ERCP training.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALThe assistance type during ERCP

The senior trainer guides the trainees during ERCP procedure outside the operating room using communication equipment and the screen displaying an endoscopic view.

Sponsors

Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Air Force Military Medical University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged 18-90 years who received ERCP 2. Patients with native papilla

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with altered anatomy (Billroth I/II, Roux-en-Y) 2. Type II duodenal stenosis 3. Previously failed cannulation 4. Chronic pancreatitis with stones in the pancreatic head 5. Hemodynamic instability 6. Lactating or pregnant women 7. Inability to give written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of successful biliary cannulation10 minutesThe percentage of trainee successfully biliary cannulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cannulation time1 day
Competency score from the trainer and endoscopic video1 day
Incidences of PEP and other adverse events1 month
Ionizing radiation time1 day

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYanglin Pan, MD
yanglinpan@hotmail.com86-29-84771536
Backup ContactXu Wang
wangx5991@163.com13395437645

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026